2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2777-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of acute administration of nicotinic and muscarinic cholinergic agonists and antagonists on performance in different cost–benefit decision making tasks in rats

Abstract: Rationale Alterations in cost–benefit decision making accompany numerous neuropsychiatric conditions, including schizophrenia, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, and addiction. Central cholinergic systems have been linked to the etiology and/or treatment of many of these conditions, but little is known about the role of cholinergic signaling in cost–benefit decision making. Objectives The goal of these experiments was to determine how cholinergic signaling is involved in cost–benefit decision making, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
46
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, MK-801 inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Amador and Dani 1991); however, blockade of nicotinic receptors does not alter discounting of delayed or probabilistic reinforcement (Mendez et al 2012). As for dopamine activity, previous work has shown that acute administration of MK-801 (0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg) increases dopamine levels in prefrontal cortex (Tsukada et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, MK-801 inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (Amador and Dani 1991); however, blockade of nicotinic receptors does not alter discounting of delayed or probabilistic reinforcement (Mendez et al 2012). As for dopamine activity, previous work has shown that acute administration of MK-801 (0.03 and 0.1 mg/kg) increases dopamine levels in prefrontal cortex (Tsukada et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probability-discounting data are often analyzed by applying a two-way ANOVA to the proportion of responses for the probabilistic reinforcer (Boutros et al, 2014; Ghods-Sharifi et al, 2009; Mendez et al, 2012; Rokosik and Napier, 2012; Schindler et al, 2014; St. Onge and Floresco, 2009, 2010; St.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No additional shaping was needed prior to testing in the delay-discounting task, as it was similar in design to the RDT. A detailed description of this task is provided in Mendez et al (2012). Each 60 min session consisted of 5 blocks of 12 trials each.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%