2017
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001510
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Six-Week Hip Thrust vs. Front Squat Resistance Training Program on Performance in Adolescent Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: Objectives: To compare the ergogenic effects of back squats, deadlifts, and hip thrusts. Design: Pilot randomized-controlled trial Methods: In order to determine the feasibility of such a large training study, a pilot study was carried out with 26 male and female participants (age = 22.15 ± 2.2 years; height = 180.17 ± 8.37 cm; body mass = 87.27 ± 15.72 kg). Subjects performed squats (n = 8), hip thrusts (n = 8), deadlifts (n = 6), or nothing (control) (n = 4) for three training sessions a week, for six weeks;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
136
6
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
136
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is similar to that of Contreras et al [13], who found a significant increase (29.95%) in HT 3RM strength after 6 weeks of HTT. The outcome measure of squat performance also improved after our training program.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is similar to that of Contreras et al [13], who found a significant increase (29.95%) in HT 3RM strength after 6 weeks of HTT. The outcome measure of squat performance also improved after our training program.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, following the HTT, back squat strength greatly increased showing a 30.77% improvement on an average. The result is similar to that of Contreras et al [13], who demonstrated a 6.63% improvement on an average in front squat strength after 6 weeks of HTT. The greater improvement in squat strength in our study than that found by Contreras et al [13] may be attributed to the difference in assessment based on the squat types (back squat vs. front squat).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations