Abstract:It is well known that neurorehabilitation can reduce disability or improve handicap of people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short period (6 weeks) of a tailored, individualised outpatient rehabilitation program in people with progressive MS. A randomised-controlled trial was undertaken in patients with primary and secondary progressive MS referred to the Centro Sclerosi Multipla of Catania. One hundred and eleven patients were assessed at baseline an… Show more
“…Patti et al observed carry-over of benefits on disability for a further six weeks after a short outpatient treatment, without changing on impairment [27]. In Solari et al study, physical rehabilitation determined improvement in disability detected by FIM motor domains and had a positive impact on mental components of HRQoL perception [25].…”
Section: Jmir Serious Games [33]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inpatient setting was associated with a significant improvement in functional impairment [], disability [23], functional independence [25,38] and HRQoL [25,26]. Trials conducted in outpatient setting demonstrated effectiveness of rehabilitation in improvement of muscular strength [22], walking capacity [30], functional independence [27,38], HRQoL [22,24,26]. Home-based rehabilitation produced significant improvement in HRQoL [34, 82,83] Below, we report the conclusions of several systematic reviews which searched to assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in PwMS to explore rehabilitation approaches in different settings.…”
“…Patti et al observed carry-over of benefits on disability for a further six weeks after a short outpatient treatment, without changing on impairment [27]. In Solari et al study, physical rehabilitation determined improvement in disability detected by FIM motor domains and had a positive impact on mental components of HRQoL perception [25].…”
Section: Jmir Serious Games [33]mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Inpatient setting was associated with a significant improvement in functional impairment [], disability [23], functional independence [25,38] and HRQoL [25,26]. Trials conducted in outpatient setting demonstrated effectiveness of rehabilitation in improvement of muscular strength [22], walking capacity [30], functional independence [27,38], HRQoL [22,24,26]. Home-based rehabilitation produced significant improvement in HRQoL [34, 82,83] Below, we report the conclusions of several systematic reviews which searched to assess the effectiveness of multidisciplinary rehabilitation in PwMS to explore rehabilitation approaches in different settings.…”
“…It was stated in a Cochrane review that consisted of 14 randomized controlled and controlled clinical trials that a multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach was at the "strong evidence" level for short-term gains in the level of activity and participation in MS patients (1). There are a limited number of investigations about MS rehabilitation in the literature (1,(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Therefore, in our study, we aimed to review the sociodemographic and clinical features of the MS patients who were hospitalized at our inpatient clinic and the rehabilitation methods applied and to shed light on the studies that would be conducted on this subject.…”
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as rehabilitation methods of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) undergoing an inpatient rehabilitation program. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 104 patients with MS from 2007 to 2012 undergoing a rehabilitation program in a special rehabilitation unit was performed. Sociodemographic data were recorded. Disease-related characteristics such as disease duration, initial symptoms, the type of MS, medications, and the results of imaging methods were recorded. The examination findings of the neuromuscular system, body involvement, and functional level were determined. The ambulatory status was evaluated using Functional Ambulation Scale, activities of daily living were evaluated using Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the neurologic status was determined using Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The orthosis and aid devices used for rehabilitation, applications for spasticity and neurogenic bladder status, and additional rehabilitation methods used were recorded. Results: The mean age was 40.53±9.40 years. Of a total of 104 patients, 68 (65.4%) were female and 36 (34.6%) were male. When the patients were grouped according to the score of GDDS, 40.4% were moderate and 59.6% were severely disabled. A one-unit increase in EDSS caused a 7.032 unit decrease in the FIM score (p=0.0001). A one-unit increase in EDSS caused a 0.017 unit increase in the duration of hospitalization (p=0.078). A oneunit increase in disease duration caused a 0.082 unit decrease in the FIM score (p=0.050). A one-unit increase in disease duration caused a 0.189 unit increase in the duration of hospitalization (p=0.0001). A one-unit increase in disease duration caused a 2.89 unit increase in number of hospitalizations (p=0.0001). Conclusion: Although MS is a progressive disease, rehabilitation applications play an enormous role in functional development. The course of rehabilitation should be planned individually for each patient.
“…Functional independence and healthrelated quality of life (HRQoL) are among the outcome measures more investigated. Some studies showed as rehabilitation can improve the motor parameters of functional independence measures (FIM) in PwMS [3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, four possible options of rehabilitation's setting are described in clinical practice: home-based therapy, outpatient ambulatory therapy, inpatient hospital-based therapy and outpatient hospital-based therapy [3][4][5][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Background: The most suitable setting of rehabilitation for Persons with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) has not been identified so far because there is a general lacking of controlled studies. Aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment efficacy in terms of functional independence between two different settings. Methods: A randomized, wait-list controlled study was performed at the MS Center of the University of Catania, and Rehabilitation Center of the Hospital of Acireale, Italy. Inclusion criteria were: a) range of age 18-75, b) Expanded Disability Status Scale ≥4.0 and ≤8.0 c) self-reported worsening of standing or walking abilities in the last 6 months. The examining physician was blind to patient allocation program. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and the 36-Health Survey Questionnaire (SF-36) data were collected at T0 (baseline) and T1 (follow-up). Results: One-hundred forty-six patients were randomly assigned to three groups. Forty-nine PwMS were allocated in the outpatient treatment group (Group A), 49 patients in the inpatients treatment group (Group B) and 48 patients in the control waiting list (Group C). Both Group A and Group B showed a significant improvement in total FIM scores (p = 0.03, p = 0.008; respectively) at T1 compared to T0. No difference was found between Group A and B with regard to the FIM scores in the intergroup analysis. Group A showed significant improvement at T1 compared to T0 in all sub-items of SF-36 (p < 0.05), contrary to Group B. A significant difference in total FIM score between the three groups was found (p = 0.0003). The pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference between Group A vs Group C (p = 0.003) and Group B versus Group C (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Inpatients and oupatients rehabilitation approaches both showed efficacy in improving total FIM score. Outpatient rehabilitation setting seems to be more effective in improving patients QoL.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.