2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0193-3973(03)00021-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a shared-reading intervention on the inclusion of evaluative devices in narratives of children from low-income families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
111
0
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
8
111
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, during the experimental conditions, the children did not follow the text with their eyes and did not interrupt to ask questions and questions were not asked of them. Therefore, we cannot compare our findings directly with more interactive reading programmes (Chow et al, 2008;Reese & Cox, 1999;Sénéchal & LeFevre, 2002;Zevenbergen, Whitehurst, & Zevenbergen, 2003). However, by designing the experiment in this way, we gained tighter control over the role of story modality, because the interactiveness of the children was more homogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, during the experimental conditions, the children did not follow the text with their eyes and did not interrupt to ask questions and questions were not asked of them. Therefore, we cannot compare our findings directly with more interactive reading programmes (Chow et al, 2008;Reese & Cox, 1999;Sénéchal & LeFevre, 2002;Zevenbergen, Whitehurst, & Zevenbergen, 2003). However, by designing the experiment in this way, we gained tighter control over the role of story modality, because the interactiveness of the children was more homogeneous.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In one, Zevenbergen, Whitehurst, and Zevenbergen (2003) found that children who participated in a dialogic reading intervention produced richer narratives than children who did not participate in the intervention. Expanding on that, Reese, Leyva et al (2010) compared two interventions: children whose mothers use an elaborative reminiscing strategy improved their narrative skills in comparison to the use of dialogic reading.…”
Section: Using Questions To Scaffold Narrative Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it contributes with the still scarce literature that relates dialogic reading with gains in comprehension of narratives. Most of the surveys about interactive shared reading (e.g., Fontes & Cardoso-Martins, 2004;Lever & Sénéchal, 2011;Whitehurst et al, 1988;Zevenbergen, Whitehurst & Zevenbergen, 2003) comprised children of 2 to 6 years old, used illustrated books with few or no texts, and did not measure the effects on the comprehension of the story, focusing on other aspects (e.g., gains of expressive vocabulary measured through standardized tests). This survey, by finding positive effects of the dialogic reading on the comprehension of texts among children aged 8-13 years, suggests that dialogic reading could promote not only gains in vocabulary, but also the comprehension of the story when interventions during the shared reading (prompts, differential reinforcers and expansions of the child's responses) are planned to facilitate the control of the child's verbal behavior through important thematic dimensions of the narrative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%