2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40688-017-0132-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a Mindful Breathing Exercise During Reading Fluency Intervention for Students with Attentional Difficulties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Journal of Applied School Psychology , 30 (1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2013.863259 9th–12th graders ( n = 49) TLS Yoga, breathing, meditation Implementation checklist and observation None Idler et al ( 2017 ). Effects of a mindful breathing exercise during reading fluency intervention for students with attentional difficulties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Journal of Applied School Psychology , 30 (1), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377903.2013.863259 9th–12th graders ( n = 49) TLS Yoga, breathing, meditation Implementation checklist and observation None Idler et al ( 2017 ). Effects of a mindful breathing exercise during reading fluency intervention for students with attentional difficulties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study did not include a behavior outcome. Idler et al (2017) had a mean effect size for Tau-U of 0.21 (SD = 0.27, range: 0.03 -0.61) on passage reading fluency and 0.21 (SD = 0.27, range: 0.30 -0.59) on a student survey of attention delivered prior to the reading activities. Idler and colleagues' ( 2017) study was the only study to measure both reading and behavior (i.e., attention), and also the only study to measure behavior with a survey (as compared to direct observation).…”
Section: Combined Reading and Behavioral Interventions On Reading Or ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We reviewed the full text of 94 studies and excluded 86 studies due to either the study not including students with K-12 SWRD+ADHD or an insufficient number of students to establish three determinations of effect (IES, 2020; k = 56 ), a research design other than SCD was used (k = 7), the study did not meet SCD standards with or without reservations (IES, 2020; k = 22), or the instruction was delivered in a language other than English (k = 1). This resulted in eight studies from the electronic database search meeting the inclusion criteria (Bouck et al, 2021;Bruhn et al, 2016;Carroll et al, 2015;Cho & Blair, 2017;Flores & Ganz, 2007;Hook & DuPaul, 1999;Idler et al, 2017;Shimabukuro et al, 1999). Figure 1 outlines the screening process and summarizes reasons for exclusion.…”
Section: Electronic Database Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next set of articles provides innovative examples of using MBI at the targeted level of service delivery. Specifically, Idler et al (2017) tested the utility of MBI as an adjunct component within a standard reading fluency intervention for elementary students, whereas Milligan et al (2017) explored the effects of a mindfulness-based mixed martial arts intervention with atrisk secondary students. Both of these studies provide useful starting points for others interested in similar innovative applications of MBI with target populations in schools.…”
Section: This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%