2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a microplastic mixture differ across trophic levels and taxa in a freshwater food web: In situ mesocosm experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Marchant et al (2023) reported that taxonomic richness and plankton community composition were not affected by polyethylene and polylactic acid fragment exposure. Furthermore, Yıldız et al (2022) reported that a mixture of microplastics (various polymers in sphere and fragment morphologies) did not alter the structure and population dynamics of their experimentally assembled freshwater invertebrate community, although they did find evidence of microplastics entering multiple trophic levels. In contrast to our results, a few studies have found evidence that microplastics affect the abundance of zooplankton and other invertebrates, but this effect thus far has only been reported in benthic communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, Marchant et al (2023) reported that taxonomic richness and plankton community composition were not affected by polyethylene and polylactic acid fragment exposure. Furthermore, Yıldız et al (2022) reported that a mixture of microplastics (various polymers in sphere and fragment morphologies) did not alter the structure and population dynamics of their experimentally assembled freshwater invertebrate community, although they did find evidence of microplastics entering multiple trophic levels. In contrast to our results, a few studies have found evidence that microplastics affect the abundance of zooplankton and other invertebrates, but this effect thus far has only been reported in benthic communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose to investigate the effects of polyester microplastic fibers because they are one of the most dominant morphologies and polymer types found in the environment (Klasios & Tseng, 2023;Napper et al, 2023) and within organisms (Rebelein et al, 2021). While different polymer types are well represented in micro-and mesocosm studies (Aljaibachi et al, 2020;Rauchschwalbe et al, 2022;Silva et al, 2022;Yıldız et al, 2022), the tested microplastic morphologies have been mostly limited to fragments and spheres, with only Rauchschwalbe et al (2022) including fibrous particles. Despite fibers emerging as a dominant morphology found in nature, studies evaluating fiber toxicity on single species are currently still underrepresented in ecotoxicity research (Bour et al, 2020) and evidently even less represented in community-level studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did not take into account the microplastic ingestion by zooplankton species, although they have been reported in laboratory studies (Canniff & Hoang, 2018; Frydkjær et al., 2017). However, a recent in situ mesocosm experimental study suggested that microplastic ingestion by zooplankton could be fairly limited in complex natural habitat with fish (Yıldız et al., 2022). Moreover, while our model assumed non‐consumption of microplastics by the predator species (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, while our model assumed non‐consumption of microplastics by the predator species (i.e. adult perch), microplastic consumption might be possible as a consequence of trophic transfer from consumer species that contain microplastics in their gut (Yıldız et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chironomids are often the most abundant group of macroinvertebrates in the number of species and individuals encountered in freshwater environments, particularly in benthos [ 5 ]. Concerningly, they are also one of the most sensitive groups to the presence of microplastics in sediments, revealing the high ingestion rates, bioaccumulation, and adverse effects in laboratory conditions, when considering life history traits and biochemical/physiological response mechanisms [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ] ( Table 1 ). In addition, the decrease in such organisms (along with other detritivores and shredders) in a mesocosms experiment with contaminated sediments with microplastics (Polyethylene- PE, concentrations from 0.1 to 10 g/kg) significantly (and negatively) affected freshwater macroinvertebrate community (abundance, structure, and composition), although no significant effects on organic matter decomposition nor primary production were denoted potentially due to the short test duration (e.g., [ 13 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%