2005
DOI: 10.1002/pon.871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a family intervention on the quality of life of women with recurrent breast cancer and their family caregivers

Abstract: Although the family intervention had positive effects initially, these effects were not sustained over time. Future studies need to consider program dose and duration of effect, outcome measures that are more sensitive to change, and realistic end-points for patients with advanced cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
313
1
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(331 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
12
313
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…More sessions may have allowed a greater number of concerns to be addressed. Northouse et al (2005) came to similar conclusions with their trial of a psycho-educational family intervention program that was also based on the FOCUS framework. However, this may create issues for adoption in routine practice as more sessions would be more resource intensive (Schofield et al, in press) and patients may not be prepared to attend many more sessions, particularly because fatigue was a major problem .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More sessions may have allowed a greater number of concerns to be addressed. Northouse et al (2005) came to similar conclusions with their trial of a psycho-educational family intervention program that was also based on the FOCUS framework. However, this may create issues for adoption in routine practice as more sessions would be more resource intensive (Schofield et al, in press) and patients may not be prepared to attend many more sessions, particularly because fatigue was a major problem .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Family members were included in the intervention because the involvement of others in psychosocial interventions for cancer patients reduces significantly patient anxiety and distress (Newell et al, 2002). An intensive five-session intervention using this framework and delivered by a specialist nurse has been found to be effective for women with advanced breast cancer in terms of reducing feelings of hopelessness (Northouse et al, 2005). In this study, cognitivebehavioural techniques were used to improve coping, levels of optimism and self-care management.…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these data, a new finding was the negative contribution of symptomsparticularly vaginal changes and fatigue-to women's worries and stress regarding body changes. Some quality of life studies have used the KPS or patient symptom reports (Dodd, 1988;Northouse, Kershaw, Mood, & Schafenacker, 2005;Scheier et al, 2005), but the use of the symptom-atology and toxicity listing is novel. These measures are costly, as medical expertise is required of the rater (e.g., a nurse specialist), yet they provide the benefit of objective, symptom-specific scales, unlike patient self reported health which is prone to reporting biases, including co-variation with negative affect (e.g., Denollet, 1991;Geisser, Roth, Theisen, Robinson, & Riley, 2000).…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These numbers imply that more and more families in Turkey have to live with and care for a relative suffering from cancer. Family caregivers play a central role in managing all aspects of the patient's care (Northouse, 2005). Family structure has an extremely important place in traditional Turkish culture, and caregivers are affected by this structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%