1995
DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00167-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a dopaminergic agonist in the guinea pig cochlea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The D 1 agonist CAPB and the D 2 agonist QUI modulated the frequency of afferent discharge in the range of 50-100 M . Sensitivity of bath-applied DOP agonists obtained in the present experiments corresponds well to results reported on the inhibitory effects of DOP agonists in the mammalian cochlea [14][15][16] . Interestingly, the dose-response curves of DOP agonists were quite similar to each other in one important respect: without stimulation, the vestibular organs demonstrated ongoing transmitter release as shown by the continuous afferent discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The D 1 agonist CAPB and the D 2 agonist QUI modulated the frequency of afferent discharge in the range of 50-100 M . Sensitivity of bath-applied DOP agonists obtained in the present experiments corresponds well to results reported on the inhibitory effects of DOP agonists in the mammalian cochlea [14][15][16] . Interestingly, the dose-response curves of DOP agonists were quite similar to each other in one important respect: without stimulation, the vestibular organs demonstrated ongoing transmitter release as shown by the continuous afferent discharge.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The action of DOP and its agonists on the chemically induced activity of afferent nerve fibers could be blocked by the D 1 and D 2 antagonists. Electrophysiological data from piribedil, a dopaminergic D 2 /D 3 agonist, clearly demonstrated the modulatory action of this substance on radial afferent dendrites [16] . Moreover, this agonist was shown to play an immediate protective role in the prevention of dendrite damage under pathophysiological conditions resulting from an excitotoxic effect from L -Glu during acoustic trauma or ischemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binding by mineralocorticoid receptors results (among other effects) in an activation of the enzyme sodium-potassiumATPase, which may contribute to restoration of disturbed cellular osmolarity, electro-chemical gradients, and neuronal conduction. At this point we have to remind that dAldin et al [34] and Puel et al [35] demonstrated that dendritic damage at the base of inner hair cells, the latter representing the site of CAP generation, accounts for half the contribution to acute hearing loss after acoustic trauma (especially in case of continuous noise exposure). In the long term study of d'Aldin et al [36], when the first injection of corticoid is given 1 h or 24 hours after exposure to noise, noise-induced threshold shift is decreased, recovery is faster, and less hair cell damage is observed (noise-induced hearing loss observed one day after corticoid administration: 25 dB, is almost equivalent to that observed 14 days after exposure in untreated animals: 20 dB).…”
Section: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synaptic repair can occur in 5 days [35], but most hair cell damage remains which is probably responsible for the long-term threshold shifts. It has also been demonstrated that dendrite damage could be prevented by perfusing a glutamate antagonist [35], or a dopaminergic agonist [34], into the cochlea during the noise exposure. However, it is essential to find curative drugs to treat patients who underwent acoustic trauma and to address both the hair cell injuries and the dendrite damage.…”
Section: Hearing Damage From Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation