Effects of a documentary on consumer perception of the environmental impact of meat consumption

Abstract

PurposeMeat consumption causes a large amount of global greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental problems. Studies showed that consumers underestimate the environmental impact of meat consumption compared to other food-related behaviours. A video intervention was conducted to investigate the effect of information on consumers' perception and behaviour.Design/methodology/approachTwo didactically different videos about meat and the environment and a control video were shown to 189 participants. Ratings about the environmental impact of different food-related behaviours as well as participants' meat consumption frequency were obtained directly before, one week later and one year after the screening by self-report questionnaires.FindingsMean rating of the environmental impact of meat consumption was second to the least important of the different food consumption patterns. In the first intervention group, the rating increased significantly (p = 0.001) after having watched the video. There was no such effect in the second intervention or the control group. Self-reported meat consumption frequency did not change significantly in any of the groups. No long-term differences between the groups could be found.Research limitations/implicationsThe results suggest that there is still a lack of knowledge concerning the environmental impact of meat consumption. Providing information can affect awareness, depending on the type of information delivery. The circumstances under which information encourages behaviour change need to be further explored.Originality/valueThis is the first study that investigated the impact of different videos about environmental impacts of meat consumption on consumer perceptions and behaviour.

Sustainable meat consumption intentions: conceptualisation, scale development and validation

“…It has been argued that people in higher-income, developed countries tend to prioritise environmental protection in meat choices more than citizens in emerging economies (Franzen and Vogl, 2013;Tucker, 2018;Cheah et al, 2020). Hence, providing information to consumers on the environmental benefits of eating less meat may influence behavioural Sustainable meat consumption intentions intentions (Bschaden et al, 2020). However, scholars argue that only a minority of the population express concern regarding meat (Sanchez-Sabate and Sabat e, 2019).…”

“…The production and consumption of meat are associated with negative externalities (Bonnet et al, 2020). Livestock farming disproportionally affects climate change and exploits land, water and energy resources much more than the cultivation of plant-based foods (Mogensen et al, 2020;Sahakian et al, 2020;Bschaden et al, 2020). Excessive meat consumption also poses health risks such as cardiovascular disease, stroke and forms of cancer (Cliceri et al, 2018;de Boer et al, 2017;Apostolidis and McLeay, 2019).…”

Framing sustainable food production technologies with videos – data from an experiment with German consumers

“…Nowadays, consumers are exposed to many forms of video-based communications. However, research on the effect of videos as a communication medium remains limited [ 2 ]. This dataset contributes to understanding the potential impact of video-based communication strategies.…”

Effects of Multisensory Contexts on Tofu and Soy Sauce Evaluation and Consumption

“…Forum 2023, 26, 36 2 of 6 Besides contextual effects, effects of top-down information (i.e., videos) on food-related behavior have been reported as well. For instance, Bschaden et al [8] used videos to inform people about the impact of sustainable dietary behavior and showed that this information can affect consumers' perception in the desired direction. In another study using video clips as goal-priming stimuli, direct priming of a health goal proved to be effective in steering consumers towards healthier food options [9].…”