Effects of a Cross-Training Exercise Program in Persons with Osteoarthritis of the Knee A Randomized Controlled Trial

Péloquin, Lucie; Bravo, Gina; Gauthier, Pierre; Lacombe, Guy; Billiard, Jean-Sébastien

doi:10.1097/00124743-199906000-00004

Cited by 73 publications

(69 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Of these, 12 RCTs met the inclusion criteria and contained aerobic exercise programmes as an intervention. 27,28,36,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] Of these 12 RCTs, two studies 40,48 were included in this analysis although the interventions are considered more generally global physical activity interventions -yoga and T'ai Chi. A total of 1363 patients were included in this metaanalysis.…”

Section: Summary Of the Rctsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Each session consisted of a 5-min warm-up followed by a 50-min exercise programme, which included a brisk walk and a muscle strengthening/resistance programme. 46 The control group participated in a 1-h education/information session twice a week. Results were variable depending on the outcome measured at the end of 12 weeks of treatment.…”

Section: Functional Strengthening and Aerobic Exercise Programme Versmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…18 46 A clinically important benefit was shown for functional strengthening and an aerobic exercise programme versus a control for patients with OA on outcomes of pain (19% relative difference AIMS arthritis pain scale) and function (16% relative difference AIMS mobility, 29% relative difference AIMS walking and bending, 50% relative difference AIMS2 work scale). No clinically important benefit was shown on a 5-min walk test (7% relative difference).…”

Section: Functional Strengthening and Aerobic Exercise Programme Versmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Efficacy of Aerobic Exercises For Osteoarthritis (part II): A Meta-analysis

Brosseau¹,

Pelland²,

Wells³

et al. 2004

Physical Therapy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Summary Of the Rctsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Functional Strengthening and Aerobic Exercise Programme Versmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Functional Strengthening and Aerobic Exercise Programme Versmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Efficacy of Aerobic Exercises For Osteoarthritis (part II): A Meta-analysis

Brosseau¹,

Pelland²,

Wells³

et al. 2004

Physical Therapy Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…85 Ettinger (1997) 86 van Baar (1998) 87 Maurer (1999) 88 O'Reilly (1999) 89 Péloquin (1999) 90 Deyle (2000) 91 Hopman-Rock (2000) 92 Baker (2001) 93 Fransen (2001) 94 Halbert (2001) 95 Patrick (2001) 96 Belza (2002) 97 Thomas (2002) 98 Topp (2002) 99 Foley (2003) 100 Quilty (2003) 101 Talbot (2003) 102 Hughes (2004) 103 Keefe (2004) 104 Lin (2004) 105 Messier (2004) 106 Ravaud (2004) 107 Bennell (2005) 108 Cochrane (2005) 109 Tak (2005) 110 Hay (2006) 34 Mikesky (2006) 111 Fransen (2007) 112 Hinman (2007) 113 Wang (2007) 114 Subtotal (I 2 = 0.0%; p = 0.990) Sensitivity analyses were performed for advice and information, and exercise intervention studies, with results showing minimal differences in the pooled effect estimates after exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias.…”

Section: Clinical Effectiveness Of Primary Care Interventions For Ostmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trials

Hay

Dziedzic

Foster

et al. 2018

Programme Grants Appl Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This report should be referenced as follows:Hay E, Dziedzic K, Foster N, Peat G, van der Windt D, Bartlam B, et al. Optimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trials. Programme Grants Appl Res 2018;6(4). Programme Grants for Applied ResearchISSN 2050-4322 (Print) ISSN 2050-4330 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full PGfAR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/pgfar. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Programme Grants for Applied Research journalReports are published in Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the PGfAR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. Programme Grants for Applied Research programmeThe Programme Grants for Applied Research (PGfAR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was set up in 2006 to produce independent research findings that will have practical application for the benefit of patients and the NHS in the relatively near future. The Programme is managed by the NIHR Central Commissioning Facility (CCF) with strategic input from the Programme Director.The programme is a national response mode funding scheme that aims to provide evidence to improve health outcomes in England through promotion of health, prevention of ill health, and optimal disease management (including safety and quality), with particular emphasis on conditions causing significant disease burden.For more information about the PGfAR programme please visit the website: http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding/programme-grants-forapplied-research.htm This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by PGfAR as project number RP-PG-0407-10386. The contractual start date was in July 2008. The final report began editorial review in March 2015 and was accepted for publication in May 2016. As the funder, the PGfAR programme agreed the research questions and study designs in advance with the investigators. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The PGfAR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publicatio...

show abstract

“…Meta-analysis of 9 trials 22,37,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51] with 1,503 participants provided moderate-quality evidence showing that compared with no exercise intervention, exercise intervention was effective at improving knee fl exor muscle strength.…”

Section: Muscle Strengthmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence of Improvement in Various Impairments by Exercise Interventions in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Tanaka

Ozawa

Kito

et al. 2013

J Jpn Phys Ther Assoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Purpose: To investigate improvement in various impairments by exercise interventions in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: We collected data on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of exercise intervention with those of either nonintervention or psychoeducational intervention in patients with knee OA. Data on pain, stiffness, muscle strength, range of motion, fl exibility, maximal oxygen uptake, and position sense were synthesized. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to determine the quality of the evidence. Results: Thirty-three RCTs involving 3,192 participants were identifi ed. Meta-analysis provided highquality evidence that exercise intervention improves maximal oxygen uptake, and moderate-quality evidence that exercise intervention also improves pain, stiffness, knee extensor and fl exor muscle strength, and position sense. The evidence that exercise intervention improves knee extension and fl exion range of motion was deemed as undetermined-quality. Conclusion: In patients with knee OA, improvement in pain, stiffness, muscle strength, maximal oxygen uptake, and position sense with the use of exercise intervention can be expected. Although the quality of evidence of the effect of exercise intervention on range of motion was inconclusive, exercise intervention should be recommended for patients with knee OA to improve various impairments.

show abstract

Effects of a Cross-Training Exercise Program in Persons with Osteoarthritis of the Knee A Randomized Controlled Trial

Cited by 73 publications

References 0 publications

Efficacy of Aerobic Exercises For Osteoarthritis (part II): A Meta-analysis

Efficacy of Aerobic Exercises For Osteoarthritis (part II): A Meta-analysis

Optimal primary care management of clinical osteoarthritis and joint pain in older people: a mixed-methods programme of systematic reviews, observational and qualitative studies, and randomised controlled trials

Evidence of Improvement in Various Impairments by Exercise Interventions in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About