Effects of a Conditioned Suppression Procedure on Schedule-Induced Drinking by Rats

Gillen, Norma; Keehn, J. D.

doi:10.1007/bf03394844

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Autoshaping1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1984

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More precisely, such a condition may be an aversive state that is reduced by the polydipsic behavior. In support of this assumption, they cited the fact that drinking has been shown to increase in the presence of a conditioned aversive stimulus (Gillen & Keehn, 1983).…”

Section: Autoshapingmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Operant‐respondent Distinction: Future Directions

Pear

Eldridge

1984

J Exper Analysis Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The operant-respondent distinction has provided a major organizing framework for the data generated through the experimental analysis of behavior. Problems have been encountered, however, in using it as an explanatory concept for such phenomena as avoidance and conditioned suppression. Data now exist that do not fit neatly into the framework. Moreover, the discovery of autoshaping has highlighted difficulties in isolating the two types of behavior and conditioning. Despite these problems, the operantrespondent framework remains the most successful paradigm currently available for organizing behavioral data. Research and theoretical efforts should therefore probably be directed to modifying the framework to account for disparate data.

show abstract

Section: Autoshapingmentioning

confidence: 99%