1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(98)00354-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a community restoration fire on small mammals and herpetofauna in the southern Appalachians

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
64
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combustion and desiccation of downed wood, duff, and litter can create an inhospitable environment for frogs and salamanders that are associated with moist leaf litter, ground cover, and soil (McLeod and Gates, 1998;Ford et al, 1999;Hyde, 2000;Constible et al, 2001). We found significant reductions of leaf litter in wildfires in western Oregon and prescribed fires in western North Carolina (EJH, RBB, D. Major, unpubl.…”
Section: Duff and Littermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combustion and desiccation of downed wood, duff, and litter can create an inhospitable environment for frogs and salamanders that are associated with moist leaf litter, ground cover, and soil (McLeod and Gates, 1998;Ford et al, 1999;Hyde, 2000;Constible et al, 2001). We found significant reductions of leaf litter in wildfires in western Oregon and prescribed fires in western North Carolina (EJH, RBB, D. Major, unpubl.…”
Section: Duff and Littermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If intense enough, prescribed burning conceivably could reduce the amount of downed coarse woody debris on the forest floor to the detriment of small mammals (Loeb 1996, Van Lear 1996, Ford et al 1999, McCay and Komoroski 2004. However, we believe this did not occur because we noted few instances of larger coarse woody debris being consumed whereas numerous large pieces from collapsed snags or tree mortality were added.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the burn stands, individuals may have relied on remaining hard-mast caches or belowground resources (i.e., hypogeal fungi) until aboveground resources reappeared. The open ground in the burn treatments may have facilitated chipmunk foraging for seeds and arthropods (Ahlgren 1966, Sullivan and Boateng 1996, Ford et al 1999. As an additional benefit, the nutritional content of forages and soft fruits in the burned areas may have exceeded that of prefire or unburned area values later in the growing season or subsequent growing seasons .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies in nontropical ecosystems, including deserts, grasslands, and temperate forests have recorded a decrease in the abundance of some species immediately after a wildfire (Quinn 1979, Fox 1982, Ojeda 1989, Fa and Sanchez-Cordero 1993, Churchfield 1997, Simon et al 2002, Converse et al 2006, reduced abundance in areas that are burned regularly (Sherburne-Junior 1959, Rana 1985 or the dominance of a few species in burned areas (Krefting & Ahlgren 1974, Kern 1981, Clark & Kaufman 1990. In most cases, the time elapsed since the disturbance seems to be an important variable determining the composition of the mammalian community (Vieira & Marinho-Filho 1998, Ford et al 1999, Simon et al 2002, Torre & DiĂĄz 2004, Fisher & Wilkinson 2005. In the Cerrado, Briani et al (2004) and Vieira (1999) found that small mammals were relatively tolerant to such impacts, and were especially abundant during the early successional stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%