Effects of a coal phase-out in Europe on reaching the UN Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Several European countries plan to phase out coal-fired power plants in order to reach their greenhouse gas abatement targets. Additionally, the phase-out will bring about so-called ancillary effects or co-effects. In our study, we focus on the co-effects induced in the countries that export coal to Europe. Furthermore, we examine the ancillary effects imposed on China as a major supplier of technologies (like solar energy technologies) that will replace coal-fired power plants. Using a combination of an input-output model, econometric analysis and employing the concept of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, we assess impacts of coal phase-out policies on environmental, economic, and societal dimensions. Our results show that despite negative impacts on income and employment in coal-exporting countries, a phase-out of coal-fired power plants is linked with multiple positive effects. In particular, we observe improvements in water management and biodiversity conservation, reduced release of pollutants, and improvements on a societal level. However, even if we consider a reduction in the use of coal in the European steel production sector as an additional challenge, these positive impacts on coal exporting countries remain rather small. The same applies to the effects we observe for China.

Achieving the 2030 Agenda: Mapping the Landscape of Corporate Sustainability Goals and Policies in the European Union

“…Stakeholders can monitor progress toward the SDGs using external indexes that would evaluate business models, corporate strategies, and managerial behaviors under national circumstances and within each industry. A (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) SDG 2 [18,166], 12 [166,167], 13 [167], 14 [166,168] SDG 1 [175], 3 [175], 4 [175], 6 [175], 7 [175][176][177][178], 9 [175,176,178], 11 [176], 12 [175,176,178], 13 [176,177] SDG K (Financial and Insurance Activities) SDG 1 [190], 3 [190,191], 4 [190,191], 5 [190], 8 [190,191], 9 [191], 10 [191], 13 [190], 16 [191 N (Administrative and Support Service Activities) SDG 5 [194], 6 [194], 10 [194], 11 [195], 13 [194], 16 [195], 17 [195] SDG 4, 5,…”

Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage Risks from Supply Chain Perspective: A Review of the Literature and Conceptual Framework Development

“…In addition, the broader environmental implications in the CCUS SC sector highlight the need for an all-encompassing and integrated approach to sustainable development [80]. The demand of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius and strive for 1.5 degrees Celsius necessitates not only the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, but also the protection of ecosystems, biodiversity, and human health.…”

Evaluación económica de la descarbonización del sector eléctrico en la República Dominicana

“…Una desventaja de la industria de carbón en América Latina es su distancia a los mayores centros de consumo, lo cual puede llevar al cierre de minas que no son competitivas (Auger et al, 2021). Además, grandes consumidores como China podrían implementar precios del carbono (Mo, Cui, & Duan, 2021), o bien, Europa podría dejar de consumir carbón también (Vögele et al, 2023). Lo anterior disminuiría la demanda internacional por ese recurso.…”