2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2003.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of a bacterial silage inoculant on corn silage fermentation and nutrient digestibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
25
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was observed not only during ensiling but also during the aerobic stability test. This finding is in agreement with those reported by Chen et al (1994) or Aksu et al (2004). Moreover, when Lactobacillus plantarum was used for silage inoculation, a higher increase in the concentration of LA was found (Winters et al, 2000) compared to the results reported by us.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This effect was observed not only during ensiling but also during the aerobic stability test. This finding is in agreement with those reported by Chen et al (1994) or Aksu et al (2004). Moreover, when Lactobacillus plantarum was used for silage inoculation, a higher increase in the concentration of LA was found (Winters et al, 2000) compared to the results reported by us.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…After 14 days of ensiling a significant decline of pH was detected in the inoculated silage and the effect of E. faecium EF9296 on the value of pH was prolonged until the end of experiment (including the aerobic stability test). The inoculation of silage with homofermentative or heterofermentative LAB revealed the lower value of pH (between 3 and 4) compared to the results of our study (Ranjit and Kung, 2000;Winters et al, 2000;Aksu et al, 2004). For example, in the silage inoculated with a mixture of LAB consisting of Pediococcus, Lactobacillus and Enterococcus spp., the pH value 3.76 was measured after 112 days of ensiling (Zahiroddini et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Neutral detergent fibre was reduced in fermented green (P=0.01) and oolong tea (P=0.05) residues compared to their unfermented residues. This result agrees with the findings of [20] and [21] who suggested that the reduction in NDF could be due to the stabilization characteristics of the microbial inoculant. Acid detergent fibre concentration was lower (P=0.006) for the fermented than unfermented coffee residue.…”
Section: A Chemical Composition Of Unfermented and Fermented Beveragsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Homofermentative and heterofermentative LAB inoculants are two types of inoculants commonly used in silage production. Homofermentative LAB such as Lactobacillus plantarum, generally increases lactic acid and decreases acetic acid, butyric acid and ammonia-nitrogen (NH 3 -N) levels, and the pH of the silage (Sheperd et al, 1995;Aksu et al, 2004). However, homofermentative LAB often increases aerobic deterioration of whole-crop cereal silages, probably because of insufficient VFAs to inhibit fungal growth (Weinberg et al, 1993;Filya et al, 2000;Kleinschmit & Kung, 2006b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%