2008
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2008.71
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 6 months of regular passive movements on ankle joint mobility in people with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Study design: Assessor-blinded within-subject randomized controlled trial. Objective: To determine the effects of 6 months of regular passive movements on ankle joint mobility in people with spinal cord injury. Setting: Community, Australia. Methods: A total of 20 people with tetraplegia living in the community had one ankle randomized to a control group and the other to an experimental group. Carers administered passive movements to participants' experimental ankles for 10 min, 10 times a week for 6 months. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] These findings were confirmed by a recent Cochrane review that provided high-quality evidence that passive stretch produces negligible short-term (mean between-group difference 1 , 95% CI, 0-3) or long-term (mean between-group difference 0 , 95% CI, À2 to 2) changes in joint range of motion (ROM) when administered to people with a variety of neurological conditions. The typical dose of passive stretch applied in the reported trials was 30 minutes to 12 hours per day over 4-12 weeks (median duration 30 days); 22 this dosage of passive stretch may be insufficient.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…6,8,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] These findings were confirmed by a recent Cochrane review that provided high-quality evidence that passive stretch produces negligible short-term (mean between-group difference 1 , 95% CI, 0-3) or long-term (mean between-group difference 0 , 95% CI, À2 to 2) changes in joint range of motion (ROM) when administered to people with a variety of neurological conditions. The typical dose of passive stretch applied in the reported trials was 30 minutes to 12 hours per day over 4-12 weeks (median duration 30 days); 22 this dosage of passive stretch may be insufficient.…”
supporting
confidence: 60%
“…Our results showed that stretch interventions may prevent degeneration of the joint capsule leading to contractures and may affect biochemical composition rather than the morphologic features of the cartilage, although we cannot conclude from this study whether stretching is harmful to the cartilage. Several clinical studies in patients with spinal cord injuries suggest a substantial positive effect on soft tissues in stretched positions for prolonged periods [10,11,13]. The treatments evaluated in our study, using this particular animal model, should be considered to be geared toward treatment of contractures that might form very early after spinal cord injury, not chronic contractures of long duration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it is believed that contractures can be prevented more readily than treated, and that less stretching is required to maintain rather than to increase the extensibility of soft tissues [12]. Considerable resources [12], including some rigorously designed clinical studies [1,10,11,13], have investigated the efficacy of stretching. However, it remains unclear whether the effects observed in these trials are clinically worthwhile, and the therapeutic effect of stretching on the pathophysiology of contractures has received little attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Impressions of change are commonly used as part of clinical trials in gerontology [5][6][7] and psychiatry, 6,8 but only rarely in SCI. 9,10 Although clinicians' and patients' impressions of change are subjective, they are nonetheless valuable and reflect the way clinical decisions are made in practice about ceasing, commencing or changing therapy. 5 Presumably, when clinicians or patients rate overall impressions of change in motor performance, they take into account neurological status as well as the time and effort devoted to therapy and implications of change on real life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%