2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 5 rounds of mass drug administration with diethylcarbamazine and albendazole on filaria-specific IgG4 titers in urine: 6-year follow-up study in Sri Lanka

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From 2002 to 2006, the national PELF in Sri Lanka had conducted annual MDA and many reports of its evaluation were published [2225]. Sri Lanka had easily passed transmission assessment surveys (TAS) in selected sentinel and spot check sites, as such WHO has formally acknowledged the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Sri Lanka as a public health problem in 2016 [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From 2002 to 2006, the national PELF in Sri Lanka had conducted annual MDA and many reports of its evaluation were published [2225]. Sri Lanka had easily passed transmission assessment surveys (TAS) in selected sentinel and spot check sites, as such WHO has formally acknowledged the elimination of lymphatic filariasis in Sri Lanka as a public health problem in 2016 [4].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we believe that urine ELISA is a more suitable tool to investigate true elimination or resurgence especially in the Sri Lankan context. Urine ELISA is acceptable due its easy sample collection with much improved compliance, especially among schoolchildren [12, 22]. With these features, the combination of “urine and mosquito” based tools are useful in the assessment of ongoing LF transmission in hotspots, especially at the last stages of a national elimination programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A urine ELISA which detects IgG4 antibodies against Brugia pahangi crude antigens was developed with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.6% and 99.0%, respectively [ 4 ]. The method was found to be useful to evaluate a filariasis control program by mass drug administration (MDA), even in a low endemic area in Sri Lanka [ 34 ]. A recombinant antigen recWb-SXP1 from the W. bancrofti cDNA library was applied to the urine ELISA with a high sensitivity of 96.8% among mf positive and ICT positives, and of 84.8% among ICT positives, and a high specificity of 100% [ 35 ] ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Practical Examples Of Application Of Urine For Antibody Detection In Parasitic Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-reactivity of antibodies between different helminth genera is also an issue (Genta, 1988; Lammie et al ., 2004; Weerakoon et al ., 2015; Lamberton and Jourdan, 2015; Garcia et al ., 2018; Song et al ., 2018). In some cases, genera-, or even species-specific identification of infecting helminths is essential for safe treatment strategies, for example when providing ivermectin to treat onchocerciasis in loiasis-endemic areas (Gardon et al ., 1997), or for diagnosis of species-specific pathologies such as female and male genital schistosomiasis (Itoh et al ., 2011; Vlaminck et al ., 2016; Kayuni et al ., 2019; Kukula et al ., 2019). In circumstances such as these, diagnostic assays with a higher degree of specificity than that of antibody-targeting assays are needed.…”
Section: Detection Of Anti-helminth Urine-antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are these procedures often painful, onerous and carry a risk of infection (with, for example, HIV), but they also require specific equipment and specialist health workers seldom available in endemic areas. A reliable assessment of disease prevalence within a given community can therefore often prove challenging as a result of patient aversions to being assessed, as well as through a lack of resources (Itoh et al ., 2011). Although widely considered low-cost, when taking into consideration the cumulative costs of equipment, number of personnel needed and remuneration of specialist staff, the true costs of gold standard assays are also being realized now and may likely be far more expensive than previously assumed (Turner et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%