2021
DOI: 10.21037/apm-20-1784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 5-mg dose of olanzapine for breakthrough nausea and vomiting in patients receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy: a prospective trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single-arm, prospective trial analyzed the total control (no emesis, no nausea, no rescue medications) (primary endpoint) and early efficacy using the nausea scores at 30, 60, and 120 min after taking olanzapine (secondary endpoint) in 19 patients who took olanzapine (5 mg daily for 3 days) for breakthrough CINV after carboplatin-based therapy [ 16 ]. Even though nausea was significantly reduced after 30 min ( p = 0.0078), and the scale had been reduced by 67% from the baseline after 60 min, the olanzapine 5 mg did not show the expected effect on the complete disappearance of CINV within 24 h. The main methodological problems with this study are the endpoints that were not validated, as well as the phase II study design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A single-arm, prospective trial analyzed the total control (no emesis, no nausea, no rescue medications) (primary endpoint) and early efficacy using the nausea scores at 30, 60, and 120 min after taking olanzapine (secondary endpoint) in 19 patients who took olanzapine (5 mg daily for 3 days) for breakthrough CINV after carboplatin-based therapy [ 16 ]. Even though nausea was significantly reduced after 30 min ( p = 0.0078), and the scale had been reduced by 67% from the baseline after 60 min, the olanzapine 5 mg did not show the expected effect on the complete disappearance of CINV within 24 h. The main methodological problems with this study are the endpoints that were not validated, as well as the phase II study design.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%