Volume 6: Turbomachinery, Parts a and B 2006
DOI: 10.1115/gt2006-90902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 3D Aerofoil Tip Clearance Variation on a 4-Stage Low Speed Compressor

Abstract: The aerodynamic performance of turbomachinery airfoils and therefore the overall efficiency of an engine are strongly dependent on the design of the near end wall sections of blades and vanes. In addition, good compressor stability can only be achieved if the running clearance is as small as allowed for save operation. In the engine the radial gap varies in size due to thermal effects and deterioration as well as transient maneuvers. Since the width of the running clearance can hardly be reduced, a new aerofoi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fischer et al 10 conducted an experimental investigation to study the strongly bowed stators in a 4-stage high-speed compressor and showed that separation was reduced in the bowed stator vanes and an increase in the stagnation pressure ratio and efficiency. Tschirner et al 11 showed that the effect of bow and sweep within the investigated low-speed compressor did not fully support the common theory of unloaded end-wall sections as discussed in various studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Fischer et al 10 conducted an experimental investigation to study the strongly bowed stators in a 4-stage high-speed compressor and showed that separation was reduced in the bowed stator vanes and an increase in the stagnation pressure ratio and efficiency. Tschirner et al 11 showed that the effect of bow and sweep within the investigated low-speed compressor did not fully support the common theory of unloaded end-wall sections as discussed in various studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Montomoli et al 8 calculated the LSRC test rig and showed that the unsteady simulation could reproduce total pressure loss experimentally observed near the hub at the stator exit but not found in the steady simulation. Tschirner et al 9 carried out LSRC test on three kinds of hub clearances (1.8, 3.0, and 4.8 mm, corresponding to 1.79%, 2.98%, and 4.76% span), with the purpose of studying the impact of increased running hub clearance on standard airfoils such as medium loaded stators, and showed that a sensible impact of increased running gaps onto compressor stability. Ju et al 3 studied the cantilevered stator with 1.1% span of hub clearance and gave the evolution of the hub leakage flow at NS operating condition compared with DP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%