Effects of 3-D thermal radiation on the development of a shallow cumulus cloud field

Abstract

Abstract. We investigate the effects of thermal radiation on cloud development in large-eddy simulations (LESs) with the UCLA-LES model. We investigate single convective clouds (driven by a warm bubble) at 50 m horizontal resolution and a large cumulus cloud field at 50 and 100 m horizontal resolutions. We compare the newly developed 3-D Neighboring Column Approximation with the independent column approximation and a simulation without radiation and their respective impact on clouds. Thermal radiation causes strong local cooling at cloud tops accompanied by a modest warming at the cloud bottom and, in the case of the 3-D scheme, also cloud side cooling. 3-D thermal radiation causes systematically larger cooling when averaged over the model domain. In order to investigate the effects of local cooling on the clouds and to separate these local effects from a systematically larger cooling effect in the modeling domain, we apply the radiative transfer solutions in different ways. The direct effect of heating and cooling at the clouds is applied (local thermal radiation) in a first simulation. Furthermore, a horizontal average of the 1-D and 3-D radiation in each layer is used to study the effect of local cloud radiation as opposed to the domain-averaged effect. These averaged radiation simulations exhibit a cooling profile with stronger cooling in the cloudy layers. In a final setup, we replace the radiation simulation by a uniform cooling of 2.6 K day −1 . To focus on the radiation effects themselves and to avoid possible feedbacks, we fixed surface fluxes of latent and sensible heat and omitted the formation of rain in our simulations.Local thermal radiation changes cloud circulation in the single cloud simulations, as well as in the shallow cumulus cloud field, by causing stronger updrafts and stronger subsiding shells. In our cumulus cloud field simulation, we find that local radiation enhances the circulation compared to the averaged radiation applications. In addition, we find that thermal radiation triggers the organization of clouds in two different ways. First, local interactive radiation leads to the formation of cell structures; later on, larger clouds develop. Comparing the effects of 3-D and 1-D thermal radiation, we find that organization effects of 3-D local thermal radiation are usually stronger than the 1-D counterpart. Horizontally averaged radiation causes more clouds and deeper clouds than a no radiation simulation but, in general less-organized clouds than in the local radiation simulations. Applying a constant cooling to the simulations leads to a similar development of the cloud field as in the case of averaged radiation, but less water condenses overall in the simulation. Generally, clouds contain more liquid water if radiation is accounted for. Furthermore, thermal radiation enhances turbulence and mixing as well as the size and lifetime of clouds. Local thermal radiation produces larger clouds with longer lifetimes.The cloud fields in the 100 and 50 m resolution simulations develop similarly...

The role of 1-D and 3-D radiative heating in the organization of shallow cumulus convection and the formation of cloud streets

“…The features of 3-D radiative transfer in the thermal spectral range are an increased cooling on cloud edges and a smoothed distribution of surfaces fluxes. While we compute thermal radiative transfer in a 3-D fashion, we expect these effects to be less important for this setup because feedbacks on the dynamics appear to happen only on longer timescales of a day (Klinger et al, 2017) and, more importantly, because it does not cause any asymmetries in the heating or cooling pattern.…”

A New Look at the Daily Cycle of Trade Wind Cumuli

“…For instance, the ventilation of the boundary layer humidity by shallow convective mixing can affect remotely the structure and strength of the intertropical convergence zone (Gregory, 1997;Neggers et al, 2007;Tiedtke et al, 1988). The longwave emission at shallow cloud tops as well as cold pools from precipitating cumuli impact the temperature and humidity distributions in the lower troposphere, which contribute to the mesoscale organization of shallow convection (Klinger et al, 2017;Naumann et al, 2019), but also to the transition to deep convection (Schlemmer & Hohenegger, 2014) and its aggregation (Coppin & Bony, 2015;Muller & Held, 2012). Therefore, advancing understanding of the key factors controlling (and interacting with) oceanic trade cumuli across a wide range of temporal and spatial scales, not only in models but also in observations, will certainly benefit to our understanding of climate as a whole and our ability to predict it.…”

Accelerating radiative transfer calculations for high‐resolution atmospheric models

“…Stephens et al, 1991;Barker et al, 2003a). While many have shown that differences between local and area-averaged fluxes produced by ICA and 3D RTMs can be large for some cloudy atmospheres (see several chapters in Marshak and Davis, 2005a), only a handful of CSRM experimental simulations have used 3D RT models interactively (Guan et al, 1997;Mechem et al, 2008;Jakub and Mayer, 2017;Klinger et al, 2017). It is widely recognized that the computational demands of 3D RTMs outweigh, for now at least, any scientific benefits they might afford, thereby amounting to (temporary) tacit acceptance of the ICA.…”