Abstract:3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) administered as an adjunct to talk therapy influences patient speech content and increases improvement in treatment-resistant posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Data came from the recordings of Mithoefer et al. (2011). In the third therapeutic session studied, patients were assigned, double blind, to an MDMA or a placebo group. Condition-blind scorers listened to therapy recordings and scored utterances where patients initiated topics that were empathic (regarding ot… Show more
“…Natural language processing methods have been applied in experimental studies of the effects of psychedelic drugs such as LSD (Sanz et al 2021), psilocybin (Carrillo et al 2018), and MDMA (Agurto et al 2020;Baggott et al 2015;Bedi et al 2014;Carrillo et al 2018;Corey et al 2016;Marrone et al 2010;Sanz et al 2021). Combined with machine learning, they enabled the prediction of the psilocybin treatment response in patients with treatment-resistant depression (Carrillo et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with machine learning, they enabled the prediction of the psilocybin treatment response in patients with treatment-resistant depression (Carrillo et al 2018). The language of post-traumatic stress disorder patients (during therapy) predicted posttreatment symptoms after treatment with MDMA versus placebo, where MDMA produced more treatment-relevant utterances that were negatively related to posttreatment symptom severity (Corey et al 2016). Moreover, natural language processing-derived topic models predicted longterm abstinence outcomes in individuals who reported having quit alcohol, cannabis, opioid, or stimulant use after a psychedelic substance experience (Cox et al 2021).…”
Rationale and objectives
Differences among psychedelic substances regarding their subjective experiences are clinically and scientifically interesting. Quantitative linguistic analysis is a powerful tool to examine such differences. This study compared five psychedelic substance report groups and a non-psychedelic report group on quantitative linguistic markers of psychological states and processes derived from recreational use-based online experience reports.
Methods
Using 2947 publicly available online reports, we compared Ayahuasca and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT, analyzed together), ketamine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), psilocybin (mushroom), and antidepressant drug use experiences. We examined word frequencies related to various psychological states and processes and semantic proximity to psychedelic and mystical experience scales.
Results
Linguistic markers of psychological function indicated distinct effect profiles. For example, MDMA experience reports featured an emotionally intensifying profile accompanied by many cognitive process words and dynamic-personal language. In contrast, Ayahuasca and DMT experience reports involved relatively little emotional language, few cognitive process words, increased analytical thinking-associated language, and the most semantic similarity with psychedelic and mystical experience descriptions. LSD, psilocybin mushroom, and ketamine reports showed only small differences on the emotion-, analytical thinking-, psychedelic, and mystical experience-related language outcomes. Antidepressant reports featured more negative emotional and cognitive process-related words, fewer positive emotional and analytical thinking-related words, and were generally not similar to mystical and psychedelic language.
Conclusion
This article addresses an existing research gap regarding the comparison of different psychedelic drugs on linguistic profiles of psychological states, processes, and experiences. The large sample of experience reports involving multiple psychedelic drugs provides valuable information that would otherwise be difficult to obtain. The results could inform experimental research into psychedelic drug effects in healthy populations and clinical trials for psychedelic treatments of psychiatric problems.
“…Natural language processing methods have been applied in experimental studies of the effects of psychedelic drugs such as LSD (Sanz et al 2021), psilocybin (Carrillo et al 2018), and MDMA (Agurto et al 2020;Baggott et al 2015;Bedi et al 2014;Carrillo et al 2018;Corey et al 2016;Marrone et al 2010;Sanz et al 2021). Combined with machine learning, they enabled the prediction of the psilocybin treatment response in patients with treatment-resistant depression (Carrillo et al 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combined with machine learning, they enabled the prediction of the psilocybin treatment response in patients with treatment-resistant depression (Carrillo et al 2018). The language of post-traumatic stress disorder patients (during therapy) predicted posttreatment symptoms after treatment with MDMA versus placebo, where MDMA produced more treatment-relevant utterances that were negatively related to posttreatment symptom severity (Corey et al 2016). Moreover, natural language processing-derived topic models predicted longterm abstinence outcomes in individuals who reported having quit alcohol, cannabis, opioid, or stimulant use after a psychedelic substance experience (Cox et al 2021).…”
Rationale and objectives
Differences among psychedelic substances regarding their subjective experiences are clinically and scientifically interesting. Quantitative linguistic analysis is a powerful tool to examine such differences. This study compared five psychedelic substance report groups and a non-psychedelic report group on quantitative linguistic markers of psychological states and processes derived from recreational use-based online experience reports.
Methods
Using 2947 publicly available online reports, we compared Ayahuasca and N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT, analyzed together), ketamine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), psilocybin (mushroom), and antidepressant drug use experiences. We examined word frequencies related to various psychological states and processes and semantic proximity to psychedelic and mystical experience scales.
Results
Linguistic markers of psychological function indicated distinct effect profiles. For example, MDMA experience reports featured an emotionally intensifying profile accompanied by many cognitive process words and dynamic-personal language. In contrast, Ayahuasca and DMT experience reports involved relatively little emotional language, few cognitive process words, increased analytical thinking-associated language, and the most semantic similarity with psychedelic and mystical experience descriptions. LSD, psilocybin mushroom, and ketamine reports showed only small differences on the emotion-, analytical thinking-, psychedelic, and mystical experience-related language outcomes. Antidepressant reports featured more negative emotional and cognitive process-related words, fewer positive emotional and analytical thinking-related words, and were generally not similar to mystical and psychedelic language.
Conclusion
This article addresses an existing research gap regarding the comparison of different psychedelic drugs on linguistic profiles of psychological states, processes, and experiences. The large sample of experience reports involving multiple psychedelic drugs provides valuable information that would otherwise be difficult to obtain. The results could inform experimental research into psychedelic drug effects in healthy populations and clinical trials for psychedelic treatments of psychiatric problems.
“…All studies tested young adults in their 20s-30s, with the exception of Corey et al (2016) whose mean participant age was 40.5 years old. Here, they also chronically used the unusual dose of 62.5 mg/kg [ 114 ]. Therefore, the effects of MDMA found in these participants are difficult to attribute a certain cause to, although the common theme of increased empathic utterances continues at this dose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.75 and 1.5 mg/kg MDMA increased positive emotion words, whereas 1.5 g/kg increased words describing another that were social and reflective of theory of mind (insight into another person’s mental state, which is often considered lacking in ASD [ 151 ]); increased time verbally interacting, words closer to “intimacy”, “friend”, “rapport” and “support”. One study administered an oral dose of 62.5 mg/kg with subsequent top-ups of 1.9 mg/kg, and held talking sessions, where they found that those participants exhibited increased ensuic (describing a change in their sense of self), empathic (regarding others' emotions) and entactic (inclination towards physical touch) utterances [ 114 ].…”
Background:
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterised by repetitive
behaviours, cognitive rigidity/inflexibility, and social-affective impairment. Unfortunately, no gold-standard treatments exist
to alleviate the core socio-behavioural impairments of ASD. Meanwhile, the prosocial empathogen/entactogen 3,4-
methylene-dioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) is known to enhance sociability and empathy in both humans and animal
models of psychological disorders.
Objective:
We review the evidence obtained from behavioural tests across the current literature, showing how MDMA can
induce prosocial effects in animals and humans, where controlled experiments were able to be performed.
Methods:
Six electronic databases were consulted. The search strategy was tailored to each database. Only Englishlanguage papers were reviewed. Behaviours not screened in this review may have affected the core ASD behaviours studied.
Molecular analogues of MDMA have not been investigated.
Results:
We find that the social impairments may potentially be alleviated by postnatal administration of MDMA producing
prosocial behaviours in mostly the animal model.
Conclusion:
MDMA and/or MDMA-like molecules appear to be an effective pharmacological treatment for the social
impairments of autism, at least in animal models. Notably, clinical trials based on MDMA use are now in progress.
Nevertheless, larger and more extended clinical studies are warranted to prove the assumption that MDMA and MDMA-like
molecules have a role in the management of the social impairments of autism.
“…Corey et al [ 34 ] conducted a study based on audio recording data of twenty subjects from Mithoefer et al [ 19 ] with CAPS scores greater than 50. This analysis took a novel approach by simultaneously analyzing psychotherapy, psychopharmacology, and discourse-level linguistics by examining the initiation of discourse topics by participants using MDMA or placebo.…”
Background
: 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), known recreationally as “Molly” or “Ecstasy”, is a triple monoamine reuptake inhibitor. MDMA specifically acts as a weak 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptor agonist, targeting 5-HT
2A
, 5-HT
2B
, and 5-HT
2C
receptors. Its potential use for therapeutic purposes with these pharmacological profiles remains a controversial subject. Studies have shown the potential benefits in clinical trials for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A larger amount of data has been provided for the push in support of MDMA-assisted psychotherapy in these patients.
Objective
: The aim of this article is to compute a meta-analysis and conduct a systematic review of the effects of MDMA on PTSD, discussing the potential benefits and adverse events relative to dosing and stability of treatment.
Methods
: Articles were collected and analyzed for systematic review: 16 articles were included in the systematic review that met the criteria for the use of MDMA in the treatment of PTSD as well as assessing the safety and efficacy of the drug in human participants. Ten studies were used for the meta-analysis, with a cumulative sample size of 168 patients. The significance of the findings on dosing and efficacy of MDMA in healthy human participants was quantified based on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) and PTSD symptom scores.
Results
: The disorders for which MDMA demonstrated a net positive or net negative effect on symptoms are presented separately. Adverse events in patients across all disease classes are presented. The therapeutic index for patients who demonstrated a benefit is also presented. An odds ratio for beneficial and adverse events is used to determine treatment-resistant patients who may benefit from clinical trials of MDMA.
Discussion
: Findings show promising evidence for the potential therapeutic use of MDMA alongside psychotherapy in the treatment of PTSD. The pharmacological profile of MDMA may provide direction for future drug developments to treat patients with treatment-resistant psychiatric disorders.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.