2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2016.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 12 weeks of barefoot running on foot strike patterns, inversion–eversion and foot rotation in long-distance runners

Abstract: PurposeThe purpose of this study was to determine the effects of 12 weeks of barefoot running on foot strike patterns, inversion–eversion and foot rotation in long-distance runners.MethodsThirty-one endurance runners with no experience in barefoot running were randomized into a control group and an experimental group who received barefoot training. At pre-test and post-test, all subjects ran at low and high self-selected speeds on a treadmill. Data were collected by systematic observation of lateral and back r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of McCarthy et al [13], all participants who preferred rearfoot strike became non-rearfoot strike after training with minimalist shoes. Latorre-Roman et al [18] revealed that a 12 week barefoot running program causes significant changes in foot strike patterns with a tendency towards a non-rearfoot strike in long-distance runners. In the study of Hollander et al [28], habitually shod participants who actively changed from shod to barefoot increased the foot strike index.…”
Section: Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the study of McCarthy et al [13], all participants who preferred rearfoot strike became non-rearfoot strike after training with minimalist shoes. Latorre-Roman et al [18] revealed that a 12 week barefoot running program causes significant changes in foot strike patterns with a tendency towards a non-rearfoot strike in long-distance runners. In the study of Hollander et al [28], habitually shod participants who actively changed from shod to barefoot increased the foot strike index.…”
Section: Kinematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McCarthy et al [13] showed that after a 12 week simulated barefoot training, in which the participants were free to adopt their own running pattern, 100% used non-rearfoot strike patterns. Latorre-Roman et al [18] found that a 12 week barefoot training program causes significant changes in the foot strike pattern, with a tendency towards midfoot or forefoot strikes. However, not all runners who are used to wearing conventional shoes can switch to non-rearfoot strike when wearing minimalist shoes [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such change allowed shock absorption by the muscles and ligaments of the foot, which decreased loading rates and work at the knee compared with running with a rearfoot strike pattern [13][14][15]. Warne et al showed that a six-week combination program of gait retraining and minimalist shoes could reduce the loading rate and peak impact force by transforming the pattern of RFS to a nonrearfoot strike pattern [16,17]. Female natural FFS had lower extension moment, patellofemoral joint contact force, and patellofemoral stress than those in the RFS group [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After receiving training, at low speed, there was a 33.4% reduction in the number of participants landing with an inverted foot, with these participants then exhibiting a centered strike upon landing. Additionally, changes in external foot rotation were also observed [3]. Further, an alternative study addressed the inversion and eversion of the foot during three phases: foot flat, mid-stance, and toe-off.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%