2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02558h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effector responsive hydroformylation catalysis

Abstract: A bidentate ligand with an integrated anion receptor forms dimeric rhodium complexes that become monomeric upon binding acetate guest, which is the basis for effector responsive hydroformylation catalysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 18-electron Rh–H species 1 is considered as the reference point for the computed energies. Several in situ spectroscopic studies have in fact detected 1 and have assigned a trigonal bipyramidal geometry as well . The geometric features of 1 would have implications in the geometries of other 18-electron intermediates ( 3 , 5 , and 7 ) and more so on the critical transition states ( TS1 and TS2 ), as shown in Scheme .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The 18-electron Rh–H species 1 is considered as the reference point for the computed energies. Several in situ spectroscopic studies have in fact detected 1 and have assigned a trigonal bipyramidal geometry as well . The geometric features of 1 would have implications in the geometries of other 18-electron intermediates ( 3 , 5 , and 7 ) and more so on the critical transition states ( TS1 and TS2 ), as shown in Scheme .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Typically, additives interact with the supporting ligand (or two supporting ligands interact with each other) to change the overall steric profile or the ligand bite angle, without altering the coordination number. This strategy has been highly effective in tuning the linear/branched regioselectivity in alkene hydroformylation, , including examples of cation–crown interactions tuning ligand bite angle. ,, Because the macrocycle in pincer-crown ether ligands is directly bound to the catalyst, cation binding influences the primary coordination sphere, which we propose to be essential for controlling regioselectivity and stereoselectivity between two sterically similar internal olefin isomers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach uses a single metal/ligand combination in conjunction with external additives to control the selectivity (Figure B). Noncovalent modification has been particularly impactful in the field of alkene hydroformylation, with additives (including alkali metal cations) interacting with the catalyst to tune the aldehyde product regioselectivity between terminal or secondary positions . Finding a single catalyst that can access two states capable of a dramatic switch in regioselectivity remains a challenge in hydroformylation. , The challenge seems even more daunting for olefin isomerization, where two states must discriminate between sterically similar internal olefins. We are not aware of any examples of olefin isomerization catalysts with additive-responsive selectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, additives interact with the supporting ligand (or two supporting ligands interact with each other) to change the overall steric profile or the ligand bite angle, without altering the coordination number. This strategy has been highly effective in tuning the linear/branched regioselectivity in alkene hydroformylation, 24,33 including examples of cationcrown interactions tuning ligand bite angle. 26,27,30 Because the macrocycle in pincer-crown ether is directly bound to the catalyst, cation binding influences the primary coordination sphere, which we propose to be essential for controlling regioselectivity and stereoselectivity between two sterically similar internal olefin isomers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%