2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0267-7261(02)00131-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of vertical drains in mitigation of liquefaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At shallower sections fluid leaves through the surface rather than through the drain itself. Such a phenomenon was also observed by Brennan and Madabhushi (2002). In dynamic conditions, their effectiveness in excess pore pressure reduction is not predominant; and for all tests any change in the behaviour of the remediated ground is primarily a result of the stiffening effect of the gravel drains.…”
Section: Acceleration Time Historiessupporting
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At shallower sections fluid leaves through the surface rather than through the drain itself. Such a phenomenon was also observed by Brennan and Madabhushi (2002). In dynamic conditions, their effectiveness in excess pore pressure reduction is not predominant; and for all tests any change in the behaviour of the remediated ground is primarily a result of the stiffening effect of the gravel drains.…”
Section: Acceleration Time Historiessupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Several shortcomings of gravel drains have been reported in the literature. Collective experience suggests that, although drains can certainly provide a solution, settlement can still occur to an unsatisfactory degree (Brennan and Madabhushi, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pioneering work on gravel drains as a possible method to stabilize liquefaction susceptible soil deposit is reported by Seed and Booker [4] . Numerous publications [43][44][45][46][47] describe the use of stone columns for ground reinforcement and their potential to mitigate liquefaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous publications (e.g. Barksdale and Bachus, 1983;Munfakh et aI., 1987;Baez and Martin, 1992;and Lopez and Hayden, 1992;Brennan and Madabhushi, 2002) describe the use of stone columns for ground reinforcement and their potential to mitigate the liquefaction. Liquefied and Non-liquefied subsoil conditions of two reclaimed islands in Kobe City after the 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake were investigated by Yasuda et al (1996) who identified that subsoils treated with sand compaction piles or rod (vibro) compaction did not liquefy and nor subside even though the earthquake shaking was very strong.…”
Section: Granular Piles Installation Functions Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%