2011
DOI: 10.4081/ija.2011.6.s1.e13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of the GAEC cross compliance standard Rational management of set aside (weed control through mowing) in assuring a minimum level of habitats maintenance

Abstract: The cross compliance standard Rational management of set aside (weeds control through mowing) regards sowable lands subject to the withdrawal from production (set-aside) or voluntarily withdrawn from the production. The aim of this standard is: i) to ensure a minimum level of maintenance of habitats; ii) to allow the maintenance of the productive potential and fertility of the soil; iii) to prevent the uncontrolled spread of weeds. Experimental data demonstrated that rational management of set aside according … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to emphasize the biological and biochemical attributes to soil quality, the biological quality of soil (BSQ) was first proposed by Parisi (2001) which used to measure the bioindicators of soil, especially the arthropods of soil. This approach was successfully validated with other physical and chemical indicators in several works (Aspetti et al, 2010;Begum et al, 2011;Blasi et al, 2013;Garcia et al, 1994;Madej et al, 2011;Mazzoncini et al, 2010;Menta et al, 2018;Menta et al, 2014;Raglione et al, 2011;Rüdisser et al, 2015;Visioli et al, 2013). Pascazio et al (2018) used microbial biomass, β glucosidase, mineralizable nitrogen and urease to represent the biological indicators to measure the SQI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to emphasize the biological and biochemical attributes to soil quality, the biological quality of soil (BSQ) was first proposed by Parisi (2001) which used to measure the bioindicators of soil, especially the arthropods of soil. This approach was successfully validated with other physical and chemical indicators in several works (Aspetti et al, 2010;Begum et al, 2011;Blasi et al, 2013;Garcia et al, 1994;Madej et al, 2011;Mazzoncini et al, 2010;Menta et al, 2018;Menta et al, 2014;Raglione et al, 2011;Rüdisser et al, 2015;Visioli et al, 2013). Pascazio et al (2018) used microbial biomass, β glucosidase, mineralizable nitrogen and urease to represent the biological indicators to measure the SQI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anche a livello di mesofauna è stato osservato un aumento relativo dei gruppi emiedafici e euedafici sulle superfici ritirate dalla produzione. I valori di QBS-ar ottenuti nelle parcelle monitorate gestite a set-aside sono stati superiori a 100 EMI, con livelli comparabili a quelli ottenuti da altri autori (Menta et al 2008;Ferrazzi et al 2007;Parisi et al, 2005) in aree semi-naturali e naturali e confermano i dati di Raglione et al (2011) e di Biaggini et al (2011) su set-aside. Poche sono state le differenze all'interno delle due diverse gestioni a setaside.…”
Section: Discussione E Conclusioniunclassified
“…, N 2.1 g kg -1 , P2O5 36.7 mg kg -1 (Raglione et al, 2011). Plots have been subjected to maize monoculture for the last 10 years at least.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average size of parcels was 0.8 ha. The two soil types utilized were classified according to Soil Taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff, 2003) one Typic Eutrudept with silty loam texture, located in Piedifiume (PF) and the other Vertic Eutrudept with silty clay texture with tendency to surface fissuring (vertic characteristics) on dry season, located in Casabianca (CB) (Raglione et al, 2011). The PF soil characteristics were with pH 8.1, cation exchange capacity 17.9 cmol (+) kg -1 , organic C 9.80 g kg -1 , organic matter 16.80 g kg -1 , N 1.5 g kg -1…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation