Effectiveness of Telemedical Applications in Postoperative Follow-Up After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Sharareh, Behnam; Schwarzkopf, Ran

doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.019

Cited by 156 publications

(180 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

169

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…[88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] A number of published studies focus broadly on video or remote consulting (e.g. exploring issues of usability and acceptability).…”

Section: Evidence Relating To the Use Of Virtual Consultationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Advantages and limitations of virtual online consultations in a NHS acute trust: the VOCAL mixed-methods study

Shaw

Wherton

Vijayaraghavan

et al. 2018

Health Serv Deliv Res

145

186

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Health Services and Delivery ResearchISSN 2050-4349 (Print) ISSN 2050-4357 (Online) This journal is a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (www.publicationethics.org/).Editorial contact: journals.library@nihr.ac.ukThe full HS&DR archive is freely available to view online at www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/hsdr. Print-on-demand copies can be purchased from the report pages of the NIHR Journals Library website: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk Criteria for inclusion in the Health Services and Delivery Research journalReports are published in Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) if (1) they have resulted from work for the HS&DR programme or programmes which preceded the HS&DR programme, and (2) they are of a sufficiently high scientific quality as assessed by the reviewers and editors. HS&DR programmeThe Health Services and Delivery Research (HS&DR) programme, part of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), was established to fund a broad range of research. It combines the strengths and contributions of two previous NIHR research programmes: the Health Services Research (HSR) programme and the Service Delivery and Organisation (SDO) programme, which were merged in January 2012.The HS&DR programme aims to produce rigorous and relevant evidence on the quality, access and organisation of health services including costs and outcomes, as well as research on implementation. The programme will enhance the strategic focus on research that matters to the NHS and is keen to support ambitious evaluative research to improve health services.For more information about the HS&DR programme please visit the website: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/hsdr This reportThe research reported in this issue of the journal was funded by the HS&DR programme or one of its preceding programmes as project number 13/59/26. The contractual start date was in March 2015. The final report began editorial review in July 2017 and was accepted for publication in November 2017. The authors have been wholly responsible for all data collection, analysis and interpretation, and for writing up their work. The HS&DR editors and production house have tried to ensure the accuracy of the authors' report and would like to thank the reviewers for their constructive comments on the final report document. However, they do not accept liability for damages or losses arising from material published in this report.This report presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views and opinions expressed by authors in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Department of Health and Social Care. If there are verbatim quotations included in this publication the views and opinions expressed by the interviewees are those of the interviewees and do not necessarily reflect those of the authors, those of the NHS, the NIHR, NETSCC, the HS&DR programme or the Depar...

show abstract

“…[88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98] A number of published studies focus broadly on video or remote consulting (e.g. exploring issues of usability and acceptability).…”

Section: Evidence Relating To the Use Of Virtual Consultationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A 2014 study reported on the use of Skype for orthopaedic follow-up. 94 The Skype service was offered to 78 patients, following total joint arthroplasty. Participants were invited to consult with their surgeon via Skype in addition to scheduled follow-up appointments at 1, 3, 4, 6 and 9 weeks.…”

Section: Research Context and Relevant Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Advantages and limitations of virtual online consultations in a NHS acute trust: the VOCAL mixed-methods study

Shaw

Wherton

Vijayaraghavan

et al. 2018

Health Serv Deliv Res

145

186

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[1][2][3] Telehealth in its many forms offers conveniences including increased care accessibility, decreased transportation barriers, and patient empowerment. [4][5][6][7][8] Studies of video visits have demonstrated these benefits in specialty settings including wound care, prenatal genetic screening, family planning, cardiovascular care, and home care. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] One study of patient experiences with video visits in rural areas found that they were associated with decreased travel costs and lost time/wages, increased access to social support, and better ability to tailor care delivery to patient and family needs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PURPOSE Telehealth is a care delivery model that promises to increase the flexibility and reach of health services. Our objective is to describe patient experiences with video visits performed with their established primary care clinicians. METHODSWe constructed semistructured, in-depth qualitative interviews with adult patients following video visits with their primary care clinicians at a single academic medical center. Data were analyzed with a content analysis approach. RESULTS:Of 32 eligible patients, 19 were successfully interviewed. All patients reported overall satisfaction with video visits, with the majority interested in continuing to use video visits as an alternative to in-person visits. The primary benefits cited were convenience and decreased costs. Some patients felt more comfortable with video visits than office visits and expressed a preference for receiving future serious news via video visit, because they could be in their own supportive environment. Primary concerns with video visits were privacy, including the potential for work colleagues to overhear conversations, and questions about the ability of the clinician to perform an adequate physical examination.CONCLUSIONS Primary care video visits are acceptable in a variety of situations. Patients identified convenience, efficiency, communication, privacy, and comfort as domains that are potentially important to consider when assessing video visits vs in-person encounters. Future studies should explore which patients and conditions are best suited for video visits. INTRODUCTIONT elemedicine, or telehealth, includes telecommunication via a variety of platforms designed to enhance patient-centered health care.1-3 Telehealth in its many forms offers conveniences including increased care accessibility, decreased transportation barriers, and patient empowerment. [4][5][6][7][8] Studies of video visits have demonstrated these benefits in specialty settings including wound care, prenatal genetic screening, family planning, cardiovascular care, and home care. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15] One study of patient experiences with video visits in rural areas found that they were associated with decreased travel costs and lost time/wages, increased access to social support, and better ability to tailor care delivery to patient and family needs. 16Because of these benefits, video visits are being adopted in a variety of settings. Uptake in the United States has occurred most rapidly where reimbursement is favorable. Medicare reimburses for video visits in health professional shortage areas and for specific approved services.17 As a result, much knowledge about patient experiences with video visits is limited to specific disease-related applications and to use in rural settings. [18][19][20] Video visits are increasingly used in other settings, including primary care, but there are limited data on patient experiences with primary care video visits. One study tested video visits with patients communicating via webcam with their primary care physician w...

show abstract

“…Teleorthopaedics involve the delivery of specialist services across a distance, usually between an orthopaedic surgeon and a patient [12]. It has been reported that teleorthopaedics in an outpatient setting is safe and without serious adverse events [13], that it has increased patient satisfaction [14,15] reduced travels and saved time for the patients [16,17] and reduced costs [18]. Teleorthopaedics can also improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation after orthopaedic surgery [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Remote Orthopedic Consultations: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Buvik¹,

Bergmo²,

Bugge³

et al. 2018

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effectiveness of Telemedical Applications in Postoperative Follow-Up After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Cited by 156 publications

References 13 publications

Advantages and limitations of virtual online consultations in a NHS acute trust: the VOCAL mixed-methods study

Advantages and limitations of virtual online consultations in a NHS acute trust: the VOCAL mixed-methods study

Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits

Cost-Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Remote Orthopedic Consultations: Randomized Controlled Trial (Preprint)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About