Effectiveness of Structured Care Coordination for Children With Medical Complexity

Abstract

ImportanceChildren with medical complexity (CMC) have chronic conditions and high health needs and may experience fragmented care.ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of a structured complex care program, Complex Care for Kids Ontario (CCKO), with usual care.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized clinical trial used a waitlist variation for randomizing patients from 12 complex care clinics in Ontario, Canada, over 2 years. The study was conducted from December 2016 to June 2021. Participants were identified based on complex care clinic referral and randomly allocated into an intervention group, seen at the next available clinic appointment, or a control group that was placed on a waitlist to receive the intervention after 12 months.InterventionAssignment of a nurse practitioner–pediatrician dyad partnering with families in a structured complex care clinic to provide intensive care coordination and comprehensive plans of care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresCo-primary outcomes, assessed at baseline and at 6, 12, and 24 months postrandomization, were service delivery indicators from the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care that scored (1) coordination of care among health care professionals, (2) coordination of care between health care professionals and families, and (3) utility of care planning tools. Secondary outcomes included child and parent health outcomes and child health care system utilization and cost.ResultsOf 144 participants randomized, 141 had complete health administrative data, and 139 had complete baseline surveys. The median (IQR) age of the participants was 29 months (9-102); 83 (60%) were male. At 12 months, scores for utility of care planning tools improved in the intervention group compared with the waitlist group (adjusted odds ratio, 9.3; 95% CI, 3.9-21.9; P < .001), with no difference between groups for the other 2 co-primary outcomes. There were no group differences for secondary outcomes of child outcomes, parent outcomes, and health care system utilization and cost. At 24 months, when both groups were receiving the intervention, no primary outcome differences were observed. Total health care costs in the second year were lower for the intervention group (median, CAD$17 891; IQR, 6098-61 346; vs CAD$37 524; IQR, 9338-119 547 [US $13 415; IQR, 4572-45 998; vs US $28 136; IQR, 7002-89 637]; P = .01).Conclusions and RelevanceThe CCKO program improved the perceived utility of care planning tools but not other outcomes at 1 year. Extended evaluation periods may be helpful in assessing pediatric complex care interventions.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02928757

Strategies for Accessible Breast Screening for People With Intellectual Disability

“…41 However, debate remains about the best way to deliver health care coordination, including health care coordination for people with intellectual disability. 40 , 42 The trial of a care coordination role within the breast screening context could provide important insights into this emerging body of knowledge.…”

Understanding parents’ experiences of care for children with medical complexity in England: a qualitative study

“…Recent national (NICE) guidance 22 recommended that future research should involve examining the effectiveness of ‘dedicated key workers’ and ‘care closer to home’. Results from a recent randomised-controlled trial of care coordination for CMC in Canada 23 have shown that it improves perceptions, but not of other outcomes.…”

Measure what matters: considerations for outcome measurement of care coordination for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities and medical complexity

“…Therefore, these findings emphasize the importance of using an ecological model and a multidisciplinary approach to assess the impact of different system level influences on the outcomes achieved by CC interventions. Despite the proliferation of academic studies highlighting the importance of CC and its recognition in clinical practice, measuring its impact remains challenging (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). Overall, existing CC literature for the pediatric population has used contrasting outcome measures and tools, evaluated interventions in different settings (primary care, tertiary care, emergency department-based interventions, etc.…”