Effectiveness of robot therapy on body function and structure in people with limited upper limb function: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Robot-Assisted Therapy (RT) is an innovative approach to neurological rehabilitation that uses intensive, repetitive, interactive, and individualized practice. This systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness of RT on the body function and structure of people with upper limb impairments (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017054982). A search strategy conducted on seven databases identified randomized controlled studies. Methodological quality was assessed using the PEDro scale. When possible, the data were pooled, the strength of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system, and the effect sizes were assessed using Cohen coefficient. Subgroup analyses investigated the impact on the estimated effects of the following parameters: methodological quality; portion of the assessed upper limb; duration of stroke; and intervention dose and duration. Thirty-eight studies involving 1174 participants were included. Pooled estimates revealed small effects of RT on motor control and medium effects on strength compared with other intervention (OI) at a short-term follow-up. Standardized differences in means were as follows: 0.3 (95% CI 0.1 to 0.4) and 0.5 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.8). Effects at other time points and on other investigated outcomes related to body function and structure were not found (p>0.05). The strength of the current evidence was usually low quality. Subgroup analyses suggested that the methodological quality, and duration and dose of RT may influence the estimated effects. In conclusion, RT has small effects on motor control and medium effects on strength in people with limited upper limb function. Poor methodological quality, and lower treatment dose and duration may impact negatively the estimated effects.

The Effect of Priming on Outcomes of Task-Oriented Training for the Upper Extremity in Chronic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

“…Poor methodological quality and low treatment doses and durations may negatively affect the estimated effects. 71…”

Evaluating the use of robotic and virtual reality rehabilitation technologies to improve function in stroke survivors: A narrative review

“…These findings are consistent with Ferreira et al., whose recent systematic review found a benefit of upper-limb robotics compared to conventional therapy on motor control and strength, but not on other measures of body function or structure; ADL outcomes were not analysed. 17 Another recent systematic review by Veerbeek et al. also found a benefit of upper-limb robotics (when compared to conventional therapy) on motor control and strength but no benefit on ADL.…”

The future role of robots in neuro-rehabilitation

“…It seems that low treatment dose and duration can negatively affect the results. Nevertheless, robot-mediated therapy is considered also because it has very few side effects [10].…”