2016
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiv775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Residential Acaricides to Prevent Lyme and Other Tick-borne Diseases in Humans

Abstract: Used as recommended, acaricide barrier sprays do not significantly reduce the household risk of tick exposure or incidence of tick-borne disease. Measures for preventing tick-borne diseases should be evaluated against human outcomes to confirm effectiveness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly all studies have focused on entomological outcomes, such as tick abundance, rather than human illness and most have been conducted on a small scale under optimized conditions. The importance of documenting health outcomes is highlighted by a placebo-controlled trial in which yard pesticide treatments were associated with a 60% reduction in the number of ticks, but no reduction in tick bites or tick-borne illness among household members 202 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly all studies have focused on entomological outcomes, such as tick abundance, rather than human illness and most have been conducted on a small scale under optimized conditions. The importance of documenting health outcomes is highlighted by a placebo-controlled trial in which yard pesticide treatments were associated with a 60% reduction in the number of ticks, but no reduction in tick bites or tick-borne illness among household members 202 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a ≄95% reduction of host-seeking nymphs was recorded from all but two of these studies (Table 3). In contrast, a large-scale, effectiveness study, of bifenthrin applied by commercial companies resulted in 69% control of I. scapularis nymphs on treated properties in one of two evaluation years and 45% in the other year (Hinckley et al 2016; Table 3). Levels of control typically achieved when an individual homeowner engages a commercial pest control company, and the reasons for decreased efficacy as compared with optimal experimental applications, merit further study.…”
Section: Suppression Of I Scapularis and B Burgdorferi With A Singlmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For example, controlled experimental spring applications of pyrethroids typically reduce host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs by >85% [27]. Nevertheless, a recent effort to reduce tick bites and human I. scapularis -borne infections by spraying pyrethroids along the lawn–wood interface on residential properties, rather than treating all the wooded and brushy high-risk habitat on the properties, achieved 50–70% suppression of host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs within the areas sprayed but failed to reduce either tick bites or human infection [118]. Suppression of host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs across all wooded or brushy habitats on a property, thereby getting closer to a desired goal of complete absence of ticks in this high-risk environment, intuitively should be more impactful but it is also more expensive and may come at higher environmental costs.…”
Section: Controlling I Scapularis and Reducing Tick-borne Diseases Imentioning
confidence: 99%