“…Since 2013, Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing, Guangdong, Hubei and Shenzhen have started pilot emission trading schemes (ETS), which have become a key topic of interest for many national and international researchers (Luo, Qin, & Wen, 2016;Zheng, Liu, & Wang, 2015). Whereas some researchers focus more on the prospects of the pilot schemes (Zhang, Karplus, Cassisa, & Zhang, 2014), the ETS schemes in general (Duan, Pang, & Zhang, 2014;Qi & Wang, 2013) and the experiences and lessons learnt in these seven Chinese ETS pilots (Jotzo & Löschel, 2014;Deng, Li, Pang, & Duan, 2018), others pay more attention to certain specific aspects of the ETS schemes, such as the allocation of emission allowances (Pang & Duan, 2016;Ye, Jiang, Miao, & Xie, 2017) or the cost of trading (Duan & Pang, 2013;Heindl, 2012) or alternatively a certain ETS pilot, such as Shanghai (Wu, Qian, & Li, 2014), Shenzhen (Jiang, Ye, & Ma, 2014;Jiang, Ye, Ma, & Miao, 2016), Hubei (Qi, Wang, & Zhang, 2014), or Guangdong and Shenzhen in a comparative study (Wang, Luo, Xie, Luo, & Zhao, 2016). In recent years, China's forthcoming national carbon emissions trading system has become the centre of attention in the academic world, covering topics such as the overview and prospects of the national carbon emissions trading market (Jiang, Xie, Ye, Shen, & Chen, 2016), the transition from the ETS pilots to the national carbon emissions trading market (X. , the challenges and suggestions to overcome when launching the national carbon emissions trading market (Lo, 2016;Liu & Song, 2017;Qi & Cheng, 2018).…”