2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.12.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of participatory planning for community management of fisheries in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as mentioned by David Cameron, there is a need for government funding to maintain local stakeholder coordination, although in the case of biodiversity conservation there are inherent difficulties associated with providing 'results' that can justify financial support. While increased involvement of local actors may lead to improved biodiversity outcomes, only a few studies have focussed on this critical issue, none of which has found direct links between public participation and improved biodiversity outcomes (e.g., Beierle and Konisky 2001;Sultana and Abeyasekera 2008;Newig and Fritsch 2009). Acknowledging that 'results' might be difficult to quantify, the success of the 'Big Society' in conservation would require long-term state investment in bottom-up initiatives through funding of increased research, adaptive monitoring and evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, as mentioned by David Cameron, there is a need for government funding to maintain local stakeholder coordination, although in the case of biodiversity conservation there are inherent difficulties associated with providing 'results' that can justify financial support. While increased involvement of local actors may lead to improved biodiversity outcomes, only a few studies have focussed on this critical issue, none of which has found direct links between public participation and improved biodiversity outcomes (e.g., Beierle and Konisky 2001;Sultana and Abeyasekera 2008;Newig and Fritsch 2009). Acknowledging that 'results' might be difficult to quantify, the success of the 'Big Society' in conservation would require long-term state investment in bottom-up initiatives through funding of increased research, adaptive monitoring and evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, population density could be a crucial predictor influencing local communities' compliance with PA policies. GDP PPP per capita and adult literacy rates were included because we believe that richer countries tend to have a more educated population, facilitating active community engagement in decision-making processes, which might influence compliance with PA policies (Reed 2008, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol17/iss4/art14/ Sultana andAbeyasekera 2008). IUCN category was selected because it represents the intended level of protection according to the management objectives of each PA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These minority groups include those who have a marginalised voice and those who are not usually inclined to participate; that is, 'hard-to-reach' stakeholders. One way to increase participation from the poor and marginalised is by restructuring the public participation process, which initially separates the deliberations of the poor from that of the powerful, and only later comes together to a final combined plenary session (Sultana and Abeyasekera 2008).…”
Section: Concept Of the Possible Mechanism Of 'Inclusiveness'mentioning
confidence: 99%