2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of oral antibiotics for definitive therapy of Gram-negative bloodstream infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, the impact of treatment duration on outcomes may depend on the type of antibiotic used; however, data on the specific antibiotics used were not provided in the included studies. Interestingly, according to a previously published study which assessed the effectiveness of oral antibiotics in the treatment of Gram-negative bacteremia, clinical outcomes improve with oral antibiotics of high bioavailability compared to outcomes with antibiotics of moderate or low bioavailability (such as cephalosporins or penicillins) (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the impact of treatment duration on outcomes may depend on the type of antibiotic used; however, data on the specific antibiotics used were not provided in the included studies. Interestingly, according to a previously published study which assessed the effectiveness of oral antibiotics in the treatment of Gram-negative bacteremia, clinical outcomes improve with oral antibiotics of high bioavailability compared to outcomes with antibiotics of moderate or low bioavailability (such as cephalosporins or penicillins) (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these limitations, similar results in a larger study population to corroborate the findings of this study and elucidate risk factors for failure would further enhance clinical decision‐making. A publication on the effectiveness of PO antibiotics in the treatment of gram‐negative bloodstream infections included 70.2% patients with bacteremia from a urinary source and found that antibiotics with high bioavailability had a lower rate of failure than antibiotics of moderate or low bioavailability . However, the evidence that PO therapy can be used successfully to complete the treatment course for Enterobacteriaceae bacteremic UTI, coupled with the potential for reducing costs with shorter LOSs and fewer hospital days on antibiotics, provides a foundation for use of PO antibiotics in this situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical success rates were equivalent when comparing oral beta-lactams (86.9%) with fluoroquinolones (87.1%; odds ratio [OR], 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57–2.71) and when intravenous to oral switch occurred within the first 3 days vs later [ 47 ]. Kutob and colleagues compared definitive therapy with antibiotics categorized as low (ie, oral beta-lactams, n = 77), moderate (ie, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, n = 179), or high bioavailability (ie, levofloxacin, n = 106) [ 48 ]. Failure occurred in 14% of the low, 12% of the moderate, and 2% of the high bioavailability.…”
Section: What Is the Role Of Oral Antibiotics?mentioning
confidence: 99%