Effectiveness of nurse-led cardiac clinics in adult patients with a diagnosis of coronary heart disease

Abstract

Background Coronary heart disease is the major cause of illness and death in Western countries and this is likely to increase as the average age of the population rises. Consumers with established coronary heart disease are at the highest risk of experiencing further coronary events. Lifestyle measures can contribute significantly to a reduction in cardiovascular mortality in established coronary heart disease. Improved management of cardiac risk factors by providing education and referrals as required has been suggested as one way of maintaining quality care in patients with established coronary heart disease. There is a need to ascertain whether or not nurse-led clinics would be an effective adjunct for patients with coronary heart disease to supplement general practitioner advice and care. Objectives The objective of this review was to present the best available evidence related to nurse-led cardiac clinics. Inclusion criteria This review considered any randomised controlled trials that evaluated cardiac nurse-led clinics. In the absence of randomised controlled trials, other research designs such as non-randomised controlled trials and before and after studies were considered for inclusion. Participants were adults (18 years and older) with new or existing coronary heart disease. The interventions of interest to the review included education, assessment, consultation, referral and administrative structures. Outcomes measured included adverse event rates, readmissions, admissions, clinical and cost effectiveness, consumer satisfaction and compliance with therapy. Results Based on the search terms used, 80 papers were initially identified and reviewed for inclusion; full reports of 24 of these papers were retrieved. There were no papers included that addressed cost effectiveness or adverse events; and none addressed the outcome of referrals. A critical appraisal of the 24 remaining papers identified a total of six randomised controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria. Two studies addressed nurse-led clinics for patients diagnosed with angina, one looked at medication administration and the other looked at educational plans. A further four studies compared secondary preventative care with a nurse-led clinic and general practitioner clinic. One specifically compared usual care versus shared care introduced by nurses for patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting. Of the remaining three studies, two have been combined in the results section, as they are an interim report and a final report of the same study. Because of inconsistencies in reporting styles and outcome measurements, meta-analysis could not be performed on all outcomes. However, a narrative summary of each study and comparisons of specific outcomes assessed from within each study has been developed. Although not all outcomes obtained statistical significance, nurse-led clinics were at least as effective as general practitioner clinics for most outcomes. Recommendations The following recommendations are made: • The use of nurse-led c...

Chronic disease management in primary care: from evidence to policy

“…Self‐management support could be enhanced by incorporating it into care plans, which could be achieved by linking referral to allied health professionals to the provision of self‐management support. Practice nurses are effective at providing self‐management support, 8 ‐ 12 and extending Medicare benefits to reimburse practice‐nurse time would provide an opportunity to deliver self‐management support without additional burdens on GPs. Divisions of General Practice are also well placed to provide education and support for self‐management practices.…”

Nurse practitioner‐led multidisciplinary teams to improve chronic illness care: The unique strengths of nurse practitioners applied to shared medical appointments/group visits

“…Our own CCM‐based model of SMAs includes a physician as well as an NP during the visit. This model differs from nurse‐led chronic disease clinics in which physicians play a more peripheral role (Chan et al, 2006; Mainie, Moore, Riddell, & Adgey, 2005; Thompson, Roebuck, & Stewart, 2005; Page, Lockwood, & Conroy‐Hiller, 2005). The shared/group medical models became popular in the 1990s in Colorado and California mostly within the Kaiser Permanente Medical systems.…”

Effective components of nurse-coordinated care to prevent recurrent coronary events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

“… 7 8 A previous review concluded that NCC in secondary prevention has a beneficial effect on quality of life. 9 However, no consistent relationships were observed between NCC interventions and other outcomes; in another review, almost half of the interventions had no significant effect on study outcomes. 10 Heterogeneity in intervention strategies and outcomes hinders comparison between the various studies.…”