2021
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s337105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Netarsudil as an Additional Therapy for Glaucoma in Patients Already on Maximally Tolerated Medical Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently published retrospective studies of patients in academic glaucoma practices with baseline intraocular pressures between 18 and 20 mmHg (range, 18.47 to 20.3 mmHg) showed an absolute intraocular pressure reduction of 3.0 to 3.9 mmHg reduction (or 16 to 20.9% reduction). [8][9][10][11][12] The reduction of intraocular pressure from netarsudil addition seems to be proportional to the baseline intraocular pressure. In a study with baseline intraocular pressure of 17 mmHg, the absolute intraocular pressure reduction was lower (2.2 mmHg or 13% reduction) after adding netarsudil compared with other studies with higher baseline intraocular pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently published retrospective studies of patients in academic glaucoma practices with baseline intraocular pressures between 18 and 20 mmHg (range, 18.47 to 20.3 mmHg) showed an absolute intraocular pressure reduction of 3.0 to 3.9 mmHg reduction (or 16 to 20.9% reduction). [8][9][10][11][12] The reduction of intraocular pressure from netarsudil addition seems to be proportional to the baseline intraocular pressure. In a study with baseline intraocular pressure of 17 mmHg, the absolute intraocular pressure reduction was lower (2.2 mmHg or 13% reduction) after adding netarsudil compared with other studies with higher baseline intraocular pressure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Retrospective studies have reported patient-initiated discontinuation rates of 6 to 26.8% for these adverse effects. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Patients excluded from analysis because of early discontinuation of medication may further overestimate the tolerability of netarsudil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In humans, the ROCK inhibitor netarsudil is approved for the treatment of refractory glaucoma. [ 68 ] In animal models, studies of RhoA pathway inhibition have most often utilized the bacterial endotoxin C3 transferase (a Rho GTPase inhibitor that targets RhoA as well as RhoB and RhoC) and ROCK inhibitors Y‐27632 and fasudil (HA‐1077). In addition to animal studies, fasudil has also been used in several clinical trials for a range of neurological diseases.…”
Section: Pathological Rhoa Activation In Neurological Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature search conducted in PubMed revealed four studies investigating the effectiveness of netarsudil in patients already taking multiple IOP-lowering agents in real-world settings. 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 However, previous studies lack a control cohort that would be beneficial in comparing changes across time, avoiding potential biases, and clarifying the role of netarsudil in comparison to its peer medications. Among the different classes of medications that may be considered after prostaglandins, α-agonists are also poorly tolerated agents that are commonly prescribed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%