2011
DOI: 10.3109/14015439.2011.638669
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of nasopharyngoscopic biofeedback in clients with cleft palate speech—a systematic review

Abstract: The analyzed studies show that nasopharyngoscopy may be effective only in combination with traditional speech therapy in helping patients with cleft palate speech optimize their velopharyngeal closure in articulation, but the quantity and quality of studies are limited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This systematic review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement to guide all methodology and write-up 10…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This systematic review used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement to guide all methodology and write-up 10…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inconsistent findings may partially be explained by methodological issues, such as a wide range of study designs, difficulties accessing representative and large samples, and considerable variation in the choice of assessment tools and measures. Another consideration and possible explanation for conflicting findings could be the presence of mediating factors such as additional conditions, or other potentially influential background variables such as cleft type, gender, different mother tongue (different language than the national language at home), international adoption, hearing, and treatment of velopharyngeal inadequacy (Kuehn and Moller, 2000; Casby, 2001; Neumann and Romonath, 2012; Roberts et al, 2012; Persson et al, 2018). Therefore, studies including and investigating possible underlying factors are warranted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fonoterapia por sua vez, vem sendo cada vez mais relatada na literatura e realizada pelos grandes centros especializados na reabilitação das alterações de fala na DVF, tanto na modalidade convencional quanto na intensiva. Entre os trabalhos pesquisados para esta revisão relacionados à fonoterapia na FLP, foram encontrados artigos relatando fonoterapia convencional MOLLER, 2000;JIMENEZ-MURAT, 2001;PATEL;ROSS, 2003;HENNE, 2003;RAMIREZ, 2004;KUMMER, 2005;CHAPMAN, 2008;BISPO et al, 2011;NETTO;CERVANTES, 2011;NEUMANN;ROMONATH, 2012;WESTBERG, 2013;BESSELL et al, 2013;JAHANBIN et al, 2014;KUM-UD;PRATHENEE, 2015;CHAPMAN et al, 2015). Também foram descritos artigos que relatam a abordagem intensiva de fonoterapia (KUEHN et al, 2002;NAGARAJAH, 2003;PAMPLONA et al, 2005;DECHONGKIT;MANOCHIOPINIG, 2006;LIMA et al, 2007;DUTKA et al, 2012;PAMPLONA et al, 2012;SKIDMORE, 2012;ALLEN, 2013;MELO et al 2013;PRATHANEE et al, 2014;MORALES, 2014;MAKARABHIROM et al, 2015;SHIN;KO, 2015;DERAKHSHANDEH et al, 2016;LUYTEN et al, 2016).…”
Section: Lista De Ilustraçõesunclassified
“…Os resultados para a quinta e a sexta questões foram apresentados descritivamente nas tabelas 8 e 9, respectivamente, incluindo: esse treino sugere, empiricamente, melhorar a propriocepção do paciente quanto à produção articulatória correta e ao modo adequado de produção quando vai utilizar a "fala nova" no nível de vocábulos, principalmente quando a palavra abrange Os achados obtidos nos cinco módulos foram compilados numa única tabela (tabela 18) a qual apresenta: média geral de acertos, desvio padrão geral, mediana, primeiro (1Q) e terceiro (3Q) quartil, acerto mínimo e máximo, e valor de p ao comparar os acertos antes e depois do acesso. YSUNZA; JIMENEZ- MURAT, 2001;PATEL;ROSS, 2003;HENNE, 2003; PAMPLONA; YSUNZA; RAMIREZ, 2004;KUMMER, 2005;CHAPMAN, 2008;BISPO et al, 2011;KUMMER, 2011c;NETTO;CERVANTES, 2011;NEUMANN;ROMONATH, 2012;WESTBERG, L. R., 2013;BESSEL et al, 2013;JAHANBIN et al, 2014;KUM-UD;PRATHENEE, 2015;CHAPMAN et al, 2015).…”
Section: Fase 2: Avaliação Do Materials Por Fonoaudiólogosunclassified