2022
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00292-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of mRNA vaccine boosters against infection with the SARS-CoV-2 omicron (B.1.1.529) variant in Spain: a nationwide cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

11
68
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(33 reference statements)
11
68
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As in prior studies 13, 14 , we found that booster VE against infection and hospitalization was significantly higher as more time accrued since primary vaccination (>9 vs. 5-9 months). This is most likely related to the waning protection of primary vaccination over time in the comparator, no-booster group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As in prior studies 13, 14 , we found that booster VE against infection and hospitalization was significantly higher as more time accrued since primary vaccination (>9 vs. 5-9 months). This is most likely related to the waning protection of primary vaccination over time in the comparator, no-booster group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Some studies reported that mRNA-1273 booster VE against infection was slightly higher than BNT162b2 booster VE 14 but others did not 13 . We found that booster VE against infection, hospitalization and death was not significantly different between mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A study in Spanish registry data of people aged 40 years or over with no previous positive test for SARS-CoV-2 examined effectiveness of mRNA vaccine boosting, including a comparison of BNT162b2 with mRNA-1273 (9). For positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, it estimated a 34-day risk difference comparing mRNA-1273 with BNT162b2 of − 2.2 (− 2.7 to − 1.6) per 1,000 people (risk ratio 0.87 (0.84, 0.90)).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%