Effectiveness of Mobile Apps to Promote Health and Manage Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

Background Interventions aimed at modifying behavior for promoting health and disease management are traditionally resource intensive and difficult to scale. Mobile health apps are being used for these purposes; however, their effects on health outcomes have been mixed. Objective This study aims to summarize the evidence of rigorously evaluated health-related apps on health outcomes and explore the effects of features present in studies that reported a statistically significant difference in health outcomes. Methods A literature search was conducted in 7 databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). A total of 5 reviewers independently screened and extracted the study characteristics. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled effect size estimates for meta-analysis. Sensitivity analysis was conducted based on follow-up time, stand-alone app interventions, level of personalization, and pilot studies. Logistic regression was used to examine the structure of app features. Results From the database searches, 8230 records were initially identified. Of these, 172 met the inclusion criteria. Studies were predominantly conducted in high-income countries (164/172, 94.3%). The majority had follow-up periods of 6 months or less (143/172, 83.1%). Over half of the interventions were delivered by a stand-alone app (106/172, 61.6%). Static/one-size-fits-all (97/172, 56.4%) was the most common level of personalization. Intervention frequency was daily or more frequent for the majority of the studies (123/172, 71.5%). A total of 156 studies involving 21,422 participants reported continuous health outcome data. The use of an app to modify behavior (either as a stand-alone or as part of a larger intervention) confers a slight/weak advantage over standard care in health interventions (standardized mean difference=0.38 [95% CI 0.31-0.45]; I2=80%), although heterogeneity was high. Conclusions The evidence in the literature demonstrates a steady increase in the rigorous evaluation of apps aimed at modifying behavior to promote health and manage disease. Although the literature is growing, the evidence that apps can improve health outcomes is weak. This finding may reflect the need for improved methodological and evaluative approaches to the development and assessment of health care improvement apps. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42018106868; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=106868

Development features and study characteristics of mobile health apps in the management of chronic conditions: a systematic review of randomised trials

“…Previous reviews had summarised the impact of apps on health outcomes across different conditions, concluding that high-quality research is needed to transform the promise of mHealth technology into improved HC delivery and outcomes 7 , 28 . More recently, Iribarren et al comprehensively reviewed app-delivered behaviour change interventions targeting health outcomes and thoroughly analysed the corresponding app features 29 . However, no study on chronic diseases has comprehensively looked at both the developmental features of apps, namely the strategies and considerations adopted throughout the development stage of mobile apps, thereby including the behavioural change features adopted, and the characteristics of the evaluation study in determining the effect on a wide array of domains.…”

Quality of a Supporting Mobile App for Rheumatic Patients: Patient-Based Assessment Using the User Version of the Mobile Application Scale (uMARS)

“…An integrative, holistic treatment approach might improve patients' quality of life. Due to the wide adoption of smartphones (1), medical apps could become an effective tool (2)(3)(4)(5) to promote predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory ("P4") medicine (6).…”

Smartphone application for adolescents with anorexia nervosa: an initial acceptability and user experience evaluation

“…This underscores the importance of carefully choosing gamification mechanisms and how they are implemented to better meet patients’ needs and symptoms, avoiding adverse effects [ 52 , 53 , 66 ]. However, when properly implemented, these features can be great assets, still underused, in improving interventions’ efficiency and commitment to [ 13 , 54 , 55 ].…”

“…They mostly expected the app to help screen patients and direct them towards proper care. Besides, it seems like short-term interventions are usually more efficient, maybe because apps tend to be less used over time [ 13 ]. Finally, some clinicians did not think this app would be useful in a “face-to-face” setting, or thought it could increase patients’ expectations, thus creating the risk of disappointment.…”

“…In this context, the widespread distribution of smartphones, and thus the day-to-day interventions and assessment opportunities they provide through applications, makes them relevant devices in improving patients’ care [ 13 ]. Digital interventions have proven their effectiveness in treating psychiatric disorders [ 14 – 16 ] and several studies have shown the effectiveness of online E-Health ED programs in decreasing ED behaviors, attitudes and beliefs [ 17 ].…”