Effectiveness of Lithium-Based Products in Concrete Made with Canadian Natural Aggregates Susceptible to Alkali-Silica Reactivity

Tremblay, Christophe; Bérubé, Marc-André; Fournier, Benoît; Folliard, Kevin J.

doi:10.14359/18583

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the late 2000s it was discovered that the amount of LiNO3 needed to control the reaction was highly aggregate dependent with some aggregates not responding well at all to the compound. [5] Coupled with the growing need for lithium for the battery industry the use of LiNO3 to prevent ASR has sharply declined and is only used in very specialty applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preventing Alkali‐Silica Reaction in Concrete

Ideker,

Drimalas,

Folliard

et al. 2023

ce papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alkali‐silica reaction continues to be a challenging durability issue for portland cement‐based concrete. While myriad of preventive options is known to reduce the risk of ASR, changes in availability and consistency of materials make either prescriptive or performance‐based approaches difficult to develop and then quickly adapt. In general, the research community has supported industry with practical solutions based on empirically derived relationships, mostly from accelerated test methods and to a lesser extent realistic exposure/field structures. It is time to increase the level of science behind our approach. The research team represented in this talk is investigating a new methodology that combines the alkali availability needed to initiate ASR (aggregate specific) with the available alkali from the total cementitious blend. The relationship between reactivity of a supplementary cementitious material and the ASR expansion is also explored. This keynote lecture will: 1) Explore performance‐based testing versus prescriptive approaches and why a hybrid approach should be considered ASR prevention; 2) Evaluate the relationship between accelerated laboratory tests, outdoor exposure blocks and field structures; 3) Examine the use of “non‐traditional” supplementary cementitious materials and/or chemical admixtures to prevent alkali‐silica reaction; 4) Propose future research needs and; 5) Make recommendations for how best to prevent alkali‐silica reactivity following the proposed approach.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%