2019
DOI: 10.17573/cepar.2019.1.03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Judicial Protection against Administrative Silence in the Czech Republic

Abstract: This paper is devoted to the issue of judicial protection in case of (or against) administrative silence (inactivity) and its effectiveness on the case study of the Czech Republic. The aim of judicial protection against administrative silence is to help solving or terminating administrative silence quickly, otherwise, an imaginary vicious circle is created. The purpose of the paper is to verify whether judicial protection is indeed effective by surveying the related legislation and court practice (especially t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The issue of simplifying and electronising administrative proceedings is one of the most pressing social issues in the Visegrad Group countries (Skulová et al 2019, pp. 44-50, Jendrośka, 2003, which are discernible in the sociological research conducted on a survey group of people from the Visegrad countries (in a CAWI survey -30 residents from each country and in an IDI interview -5 residents from each country), and manifests itself in four assumptions:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of simplifying and electronising administrative proceedings is one of the most pressing social issues in the Visegrad Group countries (Skulová et al 2019, pp. 44-50, Jendrośka, 2003, which are discernible in the sociological research conducted on a survey group of people from the Visegrad countries (in a CAWI survey -30 residents from each country and in an IDI interview -5 residents from each country), and manifests itself in four assumptions:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%