2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.104027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of interventions to prevent pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was suggested in other meta-analyses, which showed a similar effect of prophylactic sacral protective dressings on preventing pressure injury. [11][12][13][14][15] This requires further investigation and explanation because no clear rationale was found to explain these results. Well-designed studies are also needed to assess the factors including the combination of different ages, gender, and ethnicity, because our meta-analysis study could not answer whether these factors are associated with the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This was suggested in other meta-analyses, which showed a similar effect of prophylactic sacral protective dressings on preventing pressure injury. [11][12][13][14][15] This requires further investigation and explanation because no clear rationale was found to explain these results. Well-designed studies are also needed to assess the factors including the combination of different ages, gender, and ethnicity, because our meta-analysis study could not answer whether these factors are associated with the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…4 Numerous meta-analyses have examined the efficacy of prophylactically applied protective dressings. [11][12][13][14][15] A 2013 Cochrane review of prophylactic use of soft silicone foam dressings showed a decrease in pressure injury frequency in numerous studies, with inadequate indication because of the low quality of the comprised studies. 16 In an update to this meta-analysis, the indication was of very low and low graded for high risk of bias and high inaccuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis by Lovegrove et al investigated nine interventions: continence management, heel protection devices, medication, nutrition, positioning, prophylactic dressings, support surfaces, topical preparations, and bundled interventions. Only support surface, heel protection device demonstrated a significant effect 19 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Only support surface, heel protection device demonstrated a significant effect. 19 In this study, we aimed to identify the risk factors for HPI among cardiovascular intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Many studies have investigated intrinsic and extrinsic factors of HPI, but few studies have been conducted on the relationship with special medical treatment like ECMO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%