Effectiveness of individual resource-oriented joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized controlled trial

Niedermann, Karin; Bie, Rob A. de; Kubli, Regula; Ciurea, Adrian; Steurer-Stey, Claudia; Villiger, Peter M.; Büchi, Stefan

doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.014

Cited by 47 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Trained patients were involved in, or delivered two SMPs,75 82 two online programmes82 83 and one patient-led interactive workshop 89. The remaining interventions were provided by one HP 18–20 23 27 29 34 35 37 40 42 49 67–71 74 80 86 87 97. Which professionals should be involved, and how many, will depend on the aim, the topic and the context for the education.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

EULAR recommendations for patient education for people with inflammatory arthritis

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe task force aimed to: (1) develop evidence-based recommendations for patient education (PE) for people with inflammatory arthritis, (2) identify the need for further research on PE and (3) determine health professionals' educational needs in order to provide evidence-based PE. Methods A multidisciplinary task force, representing 10 European countries, formulated a definition for PE and 10 research questions that guided a systematic literature review (SLR). The results from the SLR were discussed and used as a basis for developing the recommendations, a research agenda and an educational agenda. The recommendations were categorised according to level and strength of evidence graded from A (highest) to D (lowest). Task force members rated their agreement with each recommendation from 0 (total disagreement) to 10 (total agreement). Results Based on the SLR and expert opinions, eight recommendations were developed, four with strength A evidence. The recommendations addressed when and by whom PE should be offered, modes and methods of delivery, theoretical framework, outcomes and evaluation. A high level of agreement was achieved for all recommendations (mean range 9.4-9.8). The task force proposed a research agenda and an educational agenda. Conclusions The eight evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for PE for people with inflammatory arthritis are intended to provide a core framework for the delivery of PE and training for health professionals in delivering PE across Europe.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

EULAR recommendations for patient education for people with inflammatory arthritis

et al. 2015

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At 3-months follow up both groups improved in JP behaviour, the PRISM-JP group additionally improved in pain scores, arthritis self-efficacy and JP self-efficacy [15]. This publication reports on JP behaviour and other outcomes at the 6 and 12 months follow up.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Six and 12 months' effects of individual joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial

Niedermann

Büchi²,

Ciurea

et al. 2011

Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results: A total of 53 RA patients participated. The PRISM-JP group (n=26) demonstrated significantly more JP behaviour at 6 months (effect size ES=0.32; p=0.02) and 12 months (ES=0.28; p=0.04) than the C-JP (n=27). Within group analysis showed that the JP intervention was successful at 6 and 12 months in both groups (p<0.001). At 12 months the PRISM-JP group had better JP self-efficacy (p=0.02) and grip strength (p=0.04) compared to baseline.Conclusion: PRISM-JP was more effective than C-JP in terms of long-term JP behaviour at six and 12 months.

show abstract

“…The joint protection beliefs of people with RA are that this: improves physical wellbeing (specifically reducing pain and improving function); and improves psychological wellbeing, through giving an increased sense of personal control of arthritis, being less stressed because activities are much easier and making an active contribution to one's own health (Niedermann et al 2010). Niedermann et al (2011) subsequently developed an individual joint protection programme, using the same self-efficacy and self-management CBT approaches, and individualizing therapy by using the Pictorial Representation of Illness and Self Measure (PRISM). This is a brief, interactive hands-on tool that helps people visualise and discuss the impact of their condition and identify priorities for change.…”

Section: Joint Protection and Self-management In The 2000s And Onwardsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Elizabeth Casson Memorial Lecture 2014: Changing ways; changing times

Hammond¹

2014

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Effectiveness of individual resource-oriented joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis. A randomized controlled trial

Cited by 47 publications

References 33 publications

EULAR recommendations for patient education for people with inflammatory arthritis

EULAR recommendations for patient education for people with inflammatory arthritis

Six and 12 months' effects of individual joint protection education in people with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial

The Elizabeth Casson Memorial Lecture 2014: Changing ways; changing times

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About