Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population

Derks, Jan; Håkansson, Jan; Wennström, Jan L.; Tomasi, Cristiano; Larsson, Maria; Berglundh, Tord

doi:10.1177/0022034514563077

Cited by 221 publications

(267 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

231

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Of the 41 papers, only 27 had a clearly defined threshold for bone loss, most commonly 2 mm. Some authors (Derks et al., 2015; Donati et al., 2015; Tey, Phillips & Tan, 2017) used more than one threshold and also gave more than one prevalence. Tey et al.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

Doornewaard

Jacquet

Cosyn

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesThe aim of this critical review was to evaluate whether commonly used biologic diagnostic parameters correspond to implant survival and peri‐implantitis prevalence.Materials and methodsPublications from 2011 to 2017 were selected by an electronic search using the Pubmed database of the US National Library of Medicine. Prospective and retrospective studies with a mean follow‐up time of at least 5 years and reporting prevalence of peri‐implantitis as well as mean bone loss and standard deviation were selected. The correlation between reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis and reported implant survival, mean follow‐up time, mean bone loss, mean probing depth, and mean bleeding on probing was calculated. Mean bone loss and standard deviation were used for estimation of proportion of implants with bone loss exceeding 1, 2, and 3 mm.ResultsFull‐text analysis was performed for 255 papers from 4,173 available ones, and 41 met all the inclusion criteria. The overall mean weighted survival rate was 96.9% (89.9%–100%) and the reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis ranged between 0% and 39.7%, based on 15 different case definitions. The overall weighted bone loss was 1.1 mm based on 8,182 implants and an average mean loading time ranging from 5 to 20 years. No correlation was found between mean bone loss and the reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis. The estimated prevalence of implants with bone loss above 2 mm was 23%. The overall weighted mean probing depth was 3.3 mm, and mean weighted bleeding was 52.2%. Only a weak correlation was found between survival and function time (r = −0.49). There was no relation between the probing depth or bleeding and the mean bone loss, mean follow‐up time, and reported prevalence of peri‐implantitis.ConclusionBiologic parameters mean probing depth and mean bleeding on probing do not correlate with mean bone loss and this irrespective of follow‐up. Case definition for peri‐implantitis varied significantly between studies indicating that an unambiguous definition based on a specified threshold for bone loss is not agreed upon in the literature.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Derks et al. (2015) used a combination of BoP and/or suppuration with a bone loss threshold of 0.5 mm and diagnosed 24.9% with peri‐implantitis. However, when they used a bone loss threshold of 2.0 mm, only 7.8% of the implants were diagnosed with peri‐implantitis.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

Doornewaard

Jacquet

Cosyn

et al. 2018

Clinical Oral Implants Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…8 The mean number of filled teeth in those aged 75 years or more increased from 6.1 teeth in the 1987-1988 survey to 10.9 in the NSAOH in 2004-2006. In the current study, 101 dental implants were recorded in 34 of the 614 CHAMP participants. The increased promotion and accessibility to dental implants, especially when multiple implants are placed 25 in older persons -without due reflection on changing medical, pharmacological and physical conditions of older people -may lead to increasing risk of new oral disorders such as peri-implantitis. As Dudley 26 points out, there have been few studies 'solely and specifically set out to investigate' the impact of ageing on dental implant success.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health of community‐dwelling older Australian men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP)

Wright

Chu

Milledge

et al. 2017

Australian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP) is a cohort study of the health of a representative sample of Australian men aged 70 years and older. The aim of this report is to describe the oral health of these men. Methods: Oral health was assessed when the men were all aged 78 years or older. Two calibrated examiners conducted a standardized intraoral assessment. Descriptive data were analysed by statistical association tests. Participants were excluded from the collection of some periodontal assessments if they had a medical contraindication. Results: Dental assessments of 614 participants revealed 90 (14.6%) were edentate. Men had a mean of 13.8 missing teeth and 10.3 filled teeth. Dentate participants had a mean of 1.1 teeth with active coronal decay. Those in the lowincome group had a higher rate of decayed teeth and lower rate of filled teeth. Thirty-four participants (5.5%) had one or more dental implants, and 66.3% relied on substitute natural teeth for functional occlusion. Of those with full periodontal assessments; 90.9% had sites with pocket depths of 3 mm or more, 96.6% had sites with CAL of 5 mm or more, and 79.7% had three or more sites with GI scores of 2 or more. Conclusions: There was a high prevalence of periodontal diseases and restorative burden of dentitions, which suggests that greater attention needs to be given to prevention and health maintenance in older Australian men.

show abstract

“…By understanding the characteristics of these big datasets and mining them for information, observational studies have been conducted that are comparable to randomized controlled trials [24][25][26][27]. However, in the dental field, data concerning implants are not currently collected at many institutions [28]. To facilitate clinical studies for the development of implantology, it is necessary to build a database that will allow easy and rapid access to essential information.…”

Section: Generalizabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

An examination of the cumulative survival rate of narrow-diameter dental implants in the mandibular molar region: a retrospective cohort study

Nagahisa¹,

Arai²,

Baba³

2017

Dent Oral Craniofac Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effectiveness of Implant Therapy Analyzed in a Swedish Population

Cited by 221 publications

References 12 publications

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

How do peri‐implant biologic parameters correspond with implant survival and peri‐implantitis? A critical review

Oral health of community‐dwelling older Australian men: the Concord Health and Ageing in Men Project (CHAMP)

An examination of the cumulative survival rate of narrow-diameter dental implants in the mandibular molar region: a retrospective cohort study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About