2022
DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000031035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of hospital-based low intensity and inspected aerobic training on functionality and cardiorespiratory fitness in unconditioned stroke patients: Importance of submaximal aerobic fitness markers

Abstract: Introduction: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of low-to moderate intensity aerobic training on cardiorespiratory functions in chronic unconditioned stroke patients. The oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES) and the ventilatory threshold (VO 2 -VT) could represent the aerobic capacity in submaximal test. Our study examined the application of the submaximal parameters for evaluating aerobic capacity of chronic stroke patients. Materials an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The common aerobic intervention groups included MICT (n=22 arms),17 53–73 high-intensity continuous training (HICT) (n=23 arms),61 68 74–94 HIIT (n=8 arms)17 54 60 65 67 95–97 and low (n=5 arms) 63 69 74 80 88. The most common comparator was usual care (n=31 arms)53 55 57–59 62 64 65 70–73 75 78 79 81–87 89–93 95–98 which commonly included components of stroke rehabilitation such as gait retraining, active or passive range of motion, stretching, light resistance training, balance, functional training or education on physical activity, lifestyle and medication modifications and no exercise (n=4 arms) 56 66 76 94. Briefly, sample size ranged from 5 to 105 participants (mean age range, 48–76 years; one study did not report the mean age of participants76), and study duration ranged from 3 to 24 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common aerobic intervention groups included MICT (n=22 arms),17 53–73 high-intensity continuous training (HICT) (n=23 arms),61 68 74–94 HIIT (n=8 arms)17 54 60 65 67 95–97 and low (n=5 arms) 63 69 74 80 88. The most common comparator was usual care (n=31 arms)53 55 57–59 62 64 65 70–73 75 78 79 81–87 89–93 95–98 which commonly included components of stroke rehabilitation such as gait retraining, active or passive range of motion, stretching, light resistance training, balance, functional training or education on physical activity, lifestyle and medication modifications and no exercise (n=4 arms) 56 66 76 94. Briefly, sample size ranged from 5 to 105 participants (mean age range, 48–76 years; one study did not report the mean age of participants76), and study duration ranged from 3 to 24 weeks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%