The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0148-2963(02)00501-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of horizontal strategic alliances in technologically uncertain environments: are trust and commitment enough?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
62
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…will integrate a number of additional concepts that are particularly important over the longer-term relationship, overcoming competitiveness and winning sustainability. This vertical alliance motivates commitment and effectiveness of security by cooperation, exchange, and quick swapping options (Perry et al, 2004). …”
Section: Issn: 2319-1058mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…will integrate a number of additional concepts that are particularly important over the longer-term relationship, overcoming competitiveness and winning sustainability. This vertical alliance motivates commitment and effectiveness of security by cooperation, exchange, and quick swapping options (Perry et al, 2004). …”
Section: Issn: 2319-1058mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategic fit is the prerequisite for a win-win situation and can only be ensured by the explicit formulation and communication of strategic objectives, as well as the pronounced engagement of both partners. "Trust and commitment are the building blocks of alliance effectiveness" (Perry et al, 2004). Conversely, during the 'dot-com boom', some cooperation agreements purely aimed at increasing the partners' reputation by brand alliances.…”
Section: Strategic Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of cross-channel cooperation arrangements that help partners with unbalanced resource profiles and power positions to build fruitful alliances include termination penalties and exclusivity constraints that can be seen as pledges of commitment in the communication, distribution and service channels of the partner (Anderson and Weitz, 1992;Perry et al, 2004). Financial incentives in the form of equity investments or direct monetary payments are the final component of the contract (Bucklin and Sengupta, 1993).…”
Section: Power Balancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This second wave embraces a resurgence of the interests of the first wave, which is concerned on the interactions and relationships between individuals, but it is characterized by its focus on the exchanges and linkages between organizations (Powell, Koput & Smith-Doerr, 1996;Håkansson, 1987;Burt, 1980). Last years, part of this trend has also looked at the effect of individual relationships such as trust, commitment or conflict on the strategic goals on alliance performance in a separate way (Cullen, Johnson & Sakano, 2000;Luo, 2008;Perry, Sengupta & Krapfel, 2004;Das & Teng, 1998;Nielsen & Nielsen, 2009;Jiang, Jiang, Cai & Liu, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%