2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2004.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of female and male condoms in preventing exposure to semen during vaginal intercourse: a randomized trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, if the last exposure was to a large amount of semen, it is possible that the pre-coital and post-coital swabs will vary by up to 22 ng/mL by chance alone. This criterion was used in evaluating semen exposure in some studies [6,10], while other studies employed a 15 ng/mL difference [9,11]. Changing the minimum difference from 22 to 15 ng/mL would change the probability of a false-positive exposure assessment by a small amount.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, if the last exposure was to a large amount of semen, it is possible that the pre-coital and post-coital swabs will vary by up to 22 ng/mL by chance alone. This criterion was used in evaluating semen exposure in some studies [6,10], while other studies employed a 15 ng/mL difference [9,11]. Changing the minimum difference from 22 to 15 ng/mL would change the probability of a false-positive exposure assessment by a small amount.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Objective biomarkers of semen exposure, most notably prostate-specific antigen (PSA), are valid predictors of exposure to semen and may offer a reliable counterpart to user self-report for assessing condom performance during penile-vaginal intercourse [1]. An increasing number of clinical trials have incorporated testing for PSA levels to assess the performance of male and female condoms [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the male partner is not unaware of the female condom, it does provide a prevention strategy that is less dependent on male willingness. Cost and mechanical difficulties have been cited as reasons for limited uptake (Galvao et al 2005), but newer designs are easier to use, can be reused (Thomsen et al 2006), and are made of materials that improve sensation with the promise of enhancing acceptability, uptake, and cost (Coffey et al 2006). There are increasing reports of female condoms being used for HIV prevention in anal sex (http://doh.dc.gov/doh/cwp/ view,a,1371,q,602647,dohNav_GID,1839,doh Nav, |33815|,,.asp).…”
Section: The Female Condommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 The most effective womaninitiated barrier method to prevent HIV and other STI as well as pregnancy is the female condom (FC), a vaginally inserted sheath worn during sex. 13,14 The FC has become widely used for prevention in several developing countries with high HIV incidence. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Studies around the globe have found positive results from introducing FC to women of all ages, including decreased STI incidence and increased protected sex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%