2021
DOI: 10.1080/23744235.2021.1982140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of ezetimibe in human immunodeficiency virus patients treated for hyperlipidaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As ezetimibe does not interact with CYP3A4 and therefore is not associated with drug-drug interactions with HAART, it should be considered as a treatment option in PLHIV with statin intolerance, or as an additional therapy in those who already receive the maximum indicated statin dose and do not reach LDL therapeutic targets. Furthermore, the results of a recent meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials comparing rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin monotherapy showed significant reductions in LDL (−23.89 mg/dL), TC (−26.17 mg/dL), and TG levels (−18.57 mg/dL), but no reduction in HDL levels with ezetimibe [187]. Meanwhile, other studies showed a mean decrease of −18.18 mg/dL versus −9 mg/dL in TC levels, a mean decrease of −11.16 mg/dL versus −3 mg/dL in TG levels, and a mean decrease of −17.46 mg/dL versus −9.5 mg/dL in non-HDL levels [150].…”
Section: Ezetimibementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As ezetimibe does not interact with CYP3A4 and therefore is not associated with drug-drug interactions with HAART, it should be considered as a treatment option in PLHIV with statin intolerance, or as an additional therapy in those who already receive the maximum indicated statin dose and do not reach LDL therapeutic targets. Furthermore, the results of a recent meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials and single-arm trials comparing rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin monotherapy showed significant reductions in LDL (−23.89 mg/dL), TC (−26.17 mg/dL), and TG levels (−18.57 mg/dL), but no reduction in HDL levels with ezetimibe [187]. Meanwhile, other studies showed a mean decrease of −18.18 mg/dL versus −9 mg/dL in TC levels, a mean decrease of −11.16 mg/dL versus −3 mg/dL in TG levels, and a mean decrease of −17.46 mg/dL versus −9.5 mg/dL in non-HDL levels [150].…”
Section: Ezetimibementioning
confidence: 99%