2018
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2018.1703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in the survival of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: IntroductionTo determine the effectiveness and safety of extended pelvic lymphadenectomy compared with standard lymphadenectomy in the overall, cancer-specific survival and biochemical recurrence-free survival of patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy.Material and methodsClinical trials and cohort studies were included without language restrictions with the following participants: men older than 40 years of age diagnosed with localized prostate cancer who received radical p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prostate cancer (PCa) is the main cause of cancer-related mortality in males and the diagnosis, treatment, and care of these patients places a major burden on healthcare systems globally. In countries with a large proportion of elderly men, the morbidity rate associated with PCa remains high (1). Clinically, PCa is highly heterogeneous, ranging from indolent tumors to highly aggressive disease (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prostate cancer (PCa) is the main cause of cancer-related mortality in males and the diagnosis, treatment, and care of these patients places a major burden on healthcare systems globally. In countries with a large proportion of elderly men, the morbidity rate associated with PCa remains high (1). Clinically, PCa is highly heterogeneous, ranging from indolent tumors to highly aggressive disease (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guidelines from both the American Urological Association and European Association of Urology (EAU) recommend PLND with an extended template in patients with intermediateand high-risk PCa as an expert opinion under situations without distinct evidence of the oncological bene ts of PLND [18,19]. Some systematic reviews and meta-analysis referred to oncological outcomes, but most consisted of reports with low levels of evidence, and furthermore, there are considerable variations in the LN yield and the positive rate of metastasis [7][8][9][10]. However, recent reports found a modest superiority for PLND regarding the effects of BCR-free survival with hazard risks of approximately 0.6-0.7 [8,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some systematic reviews and meta-analysis referred to oncological outcomes, but most consisted of reports with low levels of evidence, and furthermore, there are considerable variations in the LN yield and the positive rate of metastasis [7][8][9][10]. However, recent reports found a modest superiority for PLND regarding the effects of BCR-free survival with hazard risks of approximately 0.6-0.7 [8,9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En varones adultos con cáncer de próstata localizado de riesgo bajo, intermedio o alto o localmente avanzado, en quienes se decida realizar prostatectomía radical (PR) más linfadenectomía pélvica (LP) como primera opción terapéutica, ¿se debería realizar linfadenectomía extendida (LPex) o linfadenectomía estándar (Lpe)?Evidencia: En la búsqueda sistemática se encontraron cuatro[23][24][25][26] …”
unclassified