2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of endovascular repair versus open surgery for the treatment of thoracoabdominal aneurysm: A systematic review and meta analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Postoperative dialysis was more frequent in the OR group (12.0% vs. 6.4%), but rates of permanent dialysis at discharge were similar (3.8% vs. 3.7%). A more recent meta-analysis found reduced mortality, cardiac, and respiratory complication rates in patients treated with F/BEVAR [108]. However, the type of treatment did not seem to influence the incidence of paraplegia.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Postoperative dialysis was more frequent in the OR group (12.0% vs. 6.4%), but rates of permanent dialysis at discharge were similar (3.8% vs. 3.7%). A more recent meta-analysis found reduced mortality, cardiac, and respiratory complication rates in patients treated with F/BEVAR [108]. However, the type of treatment did not seem to influence the incidence of paraplegia.…”
Section: Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overall treatment for thoracoabdominal aneurysms (TAAA) has improved considerably over the past three decades because of advances in surgical techniques. Although open surgical repair remains popular, it has since been supplanted by total endovascular repair 1 , 2 . Unfortunately, these operations still carry significant risks of complications and mortality, with the potential of ischemic insult to the spinal cord, kidneys and other visceral organs 3 , 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%