2002
DOI: 10.1139/l02-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of dry ponds for stormwater total suspended solids removal

Abstract: This paper reviews the factors and criteria for the design of new and the retrofitting of existing dry detention ponds to enhance removal of total suspended solids (TSS) from stormwater. Detention time is discussed as the most important factor affecting TSS removal. Two-stage facilities and multi-level outlet design are important means of enhancing TSS removal in dry ponds. Two dry ponds within the city of Edmonton were selected to evaluate their TSS removal. The level of expected TSS removal is low owing to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recommended maintenance practices for DDBs include regular mowing to control weeds and prevent woody vegetation incursion, and sediment removal as needed to maintain proper drainage function (United States Department of Agriculture , Shammaa et al. ). However, DDBs often receive infrequent or inadequate maintenance, resulting in extended ponding of surface water when drainage is impeded by erosion, sedimentation, and debris accumulation (Lindsey et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommended maintenance practices for DDBs include regular mowing to control weeds and prevent woody vegetation incursion, and sediment removal as needed to maintain proper drainage function (United States Department of Agriculture , Shammaa et al. ). However, DDBs often receive infrequent or inadequate maintenance, resulting in extended ponding of surface water when drainage is impeded by erosion, sedimentation, and debris accumulation (Lindsey et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, many countries around the world have stormwater quality regulations and guidelines in place to curb the potential degradation of water resources by the different stormwater constituents, including phosphorus [8]. With these guidelines and regulations, a suite of stormwater treatment technologies such as grassed swales [9], constructed wetlands [10] and detention ponds [11,12] has also emerged. However, some of these systems have proven ineffective for the removal of dissolved nutrients and heavy metals [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heavier sediment and buoyant litter derived from road surfaces may be filtered and settled out readily using Gross Pollutant Traps (GPT), whereas the removal of finegrained suspended solids requires stormwater to pass through a settling basin or a more elaborate treatment mechanism. Retention and detention ponds have been shown to be efficient in removing particulate-bound contaminants derived from roads, including trace metals and nutrients (Schueler and Helfrich 1988, Stanley 1996, Shammaa et al 2002, German and Svensson 2005. Pollutant reduction for retention and detention ponds is mainly through sedimentation with removal efficiency being dependent on the residence time and the proportion of the annual runoff volume effectively detained in the basin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigations on different species of Lemnaceae (duckweed) grown in detention ponds found that a polyculture of Lemna minor and Spirodela polyrhiza was the most stable nutrient sink and removed the largest amount of phosphorus from stormwater detention ponds (Perniel et al 1998). The high performance of three Canadian ponds was attributed to large water storage volumes (CWP 2002b), whereas two dry ponds in the City of Edmonton, Canada had low TSS removal capacity owing to relatively short detention times (Shammaa et al 2002). Analysis of sediment deposited in thirteen small retention ponds was found to have highly, but viable TP content (510 to 2001 mg P per kg sediment) and that nutrients were predominantly fixed on the very fine sediment fraction (516 mm), which effected trap efficiency (Verstraeten and Poesen 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%