2023
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of Double-J Metallic Mesh Ureteral Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction: A Retrospective Study

Abstract: Background/Aim: Malignant ureteral obstruction is associated with high rates of failure with traditional ureteral stents. Double-J metallic mesh ureteral stent is one of the latest options for treating malignant ureteral obstruction. However, data regarding the efficacy of using this stent in this context are limited. Thus, we retrospectively investigated the efficacy of this stent. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of all patients who required double-J metallic mesh ureteral stent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
0
0
2

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…perkutanen Ableitungen signifikant und haben eine dauerhafte Durchgängigkeitsrate von ca. 85% bei fehlenden Grad-III-und -IV-Komplikationen [40,41] (▶ Abb. 2a,b).…”
Section: Endoluminale Harnableitungunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…perkutanen Ableitungen signifikant und haben eine dauerhafte Durchgängigkeitsrate von ca. 85% bei fehlenden Grad-III-und -IV-Komplikationen [40,41] (▶ Abb. 2a,b).…”
Section: Endoluminale Harnableitungunclassified
“…2a,b). Dabei scheinen die antegrade Platzierung des Stents und das positive Ansprechen auf eine Systemtherapie mit einer höheren Erfolgsrate vergesellschaftet zu sein [40].…”
Section: Endoluminale Harnableitungunclassified
“…In people, a ureteral stent placement to relieve ureteral obstruction has been utilized for the palliation of urologic malignant disease. Stents are typically preferred over nephrostomy tubes for improved tolerability, although polymeric and metallic stents had mixed success in maintaining patency following placement in patients [52]. While there are various different devices available, metallic stents generally resist external compressive forces better than polymeric stents.…”
Section: Ureteral Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are various different devices available, metallic stents generally resist external compressive forces better than polymeric stents. Patency at the time of placement appears to be very high [52][53][54], and overall stent failure over 12 months following placement remains tolerable [52,53]. Compared to metallic stents, polymer stents may have comparable patency at 6 months and significantly diminished patency and associated quality of life at 12 months [55].…”
Section: Ureteral Stentingmentioning
confidence: 99%