2010
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.091786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of disease-management programs for improving diabetes care: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

13
167
1
21

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(35 reference statements)
13
167
1
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Results of meta-analysis performed through clinical trials showed that construction of shared care between professional and patient is a much more effective strategy to control glycemic levels and for the disease self-management, when compared with traditional strategies, guided only by professional orientations (18) . The 1.5% average and significant reduction of HbA1c, presented by individuals of the intervention group, is consistent with results presented by meta-analysis of randomized studies used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in the disease management by individuals themselves (19) . Although the mean of HbA1c for the intervention group has not evolved to indicative levels of good glycemic control, we highlight the consolidated fact in the literature, that for each 1% absolute reduction in the HbA1c mean, there is a 37% reduction of risk of microvascular complications and a 32% reduction of risk of any complication related to DM2 (20) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Results of meta-analysis performed through clinical trials showed that construction of shared care between professional and patient is a much more effective strategy to control glycemic levels and for the disease self-management, when compared with traditional strategies, guided only by professional orientations (18) . The 1.5% average and significant reduction of HbA1c, presented by individuals of the intervention group, is consistent with results presented by meta-analysis of randomized studies used to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions in the disease management by individuals themselves (19) . Although the mean of HbA1c for the intervention group has not evolved to indicative levels of good glycemic control, we highlight the consolidated fact in the literature, that for each 1% absolute reduction in the HbA1c mean, there is a 37% reduction of risk of microvascular complications and a 32% reduction of risk of any complication related to DM2 (20) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, along with this type of association can guide the management of care and educational programs for health professionals to monitor glucose levels of health services patients with diabetes. (7,8) In Brazil, the Ministry of health has created several diseases control programs that impact most of the population, and in the case of diabetes mellitus, the National Program of Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus -Hiperdia was created in 2002, in an attempt to reorient pharmaceutical assistance for the continuous supply of medicines, as well as monitoring the clinical conditions of the health services patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean reduction in A1C level in the present study was greater in comparison to the Diabetes Ten City Challenge outcomes, as may be expected for a patient population with higher baseline A1C level. A meta-analysis study supports the significant impact of disease-management programs on A1C levels [21]. However, the above-mentioned study also indicated that only programs with high frequency of pharmacist-patient interactions led to significantly greater reduction compared to programs with low frequency of interaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%